Standards for judicial conviction in constitutional interpretation of deportation protection exceptions under § 60 Abs. 7 AufenthG
Germany (DE)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Federal Administrative Court allowed an appeal for leave to appeal in an immigration case, ruling that the issue is of fundamental legal significance and permitting the proceedings to be heard on the merits. The dispute concerned the legal standard for assessing protection against deportation under German law, specifically the requirements for judicial conviction-building when applying the relevant statute in a manner consistent with constitutional law. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which grants leave to appeal where the matter has fundamental significance, as it clarifies the interpretive standards for § 60 Abs. 7 Satz 1 and 3 AufenthG regarding concrete and general dangers that warrant protection from deportation.
Legislator headnote
AI generated§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Standards for judicial conviction in constitutional interpretation of deportation protection exceptions under § 60 Abs. 7 AufenthG: The dispute concerned the legal standard for assessing protection against deportation under German law, specifically the requirements for judicial conviction-building when applying the relevant statute in a manner consistent with constitutional law. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which grants leave to appeal where the matter has fundamental significance, as it clarifies the interpretive standards for § 60 Abs. 7 Satz 1 and 3 AufenthG regarding concrete and general dangers that warrant protection from deportation.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedGround for admitting the appeal for leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
Full text
Abschiebungsschutz; konkrete und allgemeine Gefahr; verfassungskonforme Auslegung; richterliche Überzeugungsbildung; Revisionszulassung
[GRUENDE]
Die Beschwerde ist zulässig und begründet.
Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Frage geben, welche Anforderungen an die richterliche Überzeugungsbildung in Fällen verfassungskonformer Anwendung von § 60 Abs. 7 Satz 1 und 3 AufenthG zu stellen sind.