Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
5 B 62/09, 5 B 62/09 (5 C 18/10) AI generated

Scope of statutory exclusion grounds for compensation benefits under the Compensation Benefits Act

Case Number 5 B 62/09, 5 B 62/09 (5 C 18/10)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the revision of the defendant on the grounds of the matter's fundamental legal importance, thereby overturning the lower court's dismissal of the complaint and allowing the case to proceed to the substantive revision hearing. The dispute concerns the administrative law validity of a decision excluding a party from compensation benefits under public law. The decisive legal basis is § 1 Abs. 3 Nr. 1 of the Compensation Benefits Act (AusglLeistG), specifically focusing on the scope and interpretation of statutory exclusion grounds for entitlement to such benefits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 1 Abs. 3 Nr. 1 AusglLeistG; Scope of statutory exclusion grounds for compensation benefits under the Compensation Benefits Act: The dispute concerns the administrative law validity of a decision excluding a party from compensation benefits under public law. The decisive legal basis is § 1 Abs. 3 Nr. 1 of the Compensation Benefits Act (AusglLeistG), specifically focusing on the scope and interpretation of statutory exclusion grounds for entitlement to such benefits.

Keywords

AI generated
statutory ground for exclusion entitlement to benefits excluded cases administrative dismissal matter in dispute grounds for revision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Procedural ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental legal importance of the matter.
§ 1 Abs. 3 Nr. 1 AusglLeistG
Substantive legal provision regarding the exclusion from compensation benefits, which the court identified as the subject of the substantive legal question to be clarified in the revision.
AI generated
5 B 32/10, 5 B 32/10 (5 C 26/10)
Interpretation of statutory claims for compensation performance under the Compensation Performance Act
5 B 1/11, 5 B 1/11 (5 C 2/11)
Exclusion of compensation payments for significant support of the National Socialist system
5 B 24/12, 5 B 24/12, 5 PKH 5/12
Exclusion of appeal against legal aid denial in open property issues compensation proceedings
B 13 R 260/12 B
Admissibility of leave to appeal for non-disclosure of abstract legal principles in reimbursement retention and statutory limitation disputes
B 11 AL 90/11 B
Inadmissibility of leave to appeal based on fundamental significance where prior instance issued purely procedural dismissal without substantive ruling

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Procedural ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental legal importance of the matter.

§ 1 Abs. 3 Nr. 1 AusglLeistG

Substantive legal provision regarding the exclusion from compensation benefits, which the court identified as the subject of the substantive legal question to be clarified in the revision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ausschluss von Ausgleichsleistungen

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Reichweite des Ausschlussgrundes in § 1 Abs. 3 Nr. 1 AusglLeistG geben.