Legislator Case Law & Legislation
3 B 75/09, 3 B 75/09 (3 C 6/10) AI generated

Allocation of fishing quotas and consideration of voyage permits as a suitability criterion for issuing fishing licenses

Case Number 3 B 75/09, 3 B 75/09 (3 C 6/10)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to appeal for fundamental legal significance and referred the case to the Third Senate for a full review on the merits. The dispute concerns the allocation of fishing quotas and the exercise of discretion when issuing fishing permits under the Maritime Fisheries Act, specifically challenging whether a producer organization participating in small-scale high-sea fisheries can require authorities to consider, among other suitability criteria, whether competing applicants possess the necessary voyage permits. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which mandates leave to appeal if a question of fundamental legal significance arises, here defining whether permit issuance must factor into the assessment of an applicant's performance capacity and suitability the availability of required voyage permits among other bidders.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Allocation of fishing quotas and consideration of voyage permits as a suitability criterion for issuing fishing licenses: The dispute concerns the allocation of fishing quotas and the exercise of discretion when issuing fishing permits under the Maritime Fisheries Act, specifically challenging whether a producer organization participating in small-scale high-sea fisheries can require authorities to consider, among other suitability criteria, whether competing applicants possess the necessary voyage permits. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which mandates leave to appeal if a question of fundamental legal significance arises, here defining whether permit issuance must factor into the assessment of an applicant's performance capacity and suitability the availability of required voyage permits among other bidders.

Keywords

AI generated
legal capacity to act maritime area assessment criteria administrative authority conservation of marine biological resources exercise of discretion

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Cited as the legal basis for admitting the appeal for revision due to fundamental legal significance.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Aufteilung von Fischfangquoten; Ermessensausübung bei Erteilung von Fangerlaubnissen; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die von der Beklagten geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung zu (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO).

Das Revisionsverfahren wird dem Senat voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben, unter anderem die Frage zu klären, ob eine an der Kleinen Hochseefischerei teilnehmende Erzeugergemeinschaft verlangen kann, dass bei der Erteilung von Fangerlaubnissen nach § 3 Abs. 2 des Seefischereigesetzes insbesondere wegen der dort genannten Kriterien der Leistungsfähigkeit und Eignung des Fischereibetriebes auch berücksichtigt wird, inwieweit andere Antragsteller über die erforderlichen Fahrterlaubnisscheine verfügen.