Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
5 B 29/09, 5 B 29/09 (5 C 3/10) AI generated

Valuation basis for compensation of heritable building rights on rubble properties under § 3 EntschG

Case Number 5 B 29/09, 5 B 29/09 (5 C 3/10)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of the Fifth Senate admitted the revision, granting the plaintiff access to the appellate court, with the administrative court's judgment of January 27, 2009, remaining subject to review. The dispute concerned compensation law, specifically challenging the valuation basis for an erbbaurecht (heritable building right) established on a "Trümmergrundstück" (rubble property), with the central issue being the interpretation of the meaning of § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 4 and Nr. 5 of the Compensation Act (EntschG). The court decided that the question of the correct assessment basis for such compensation holds fundamental significance, necessitating a higher-level ruling to clarify the applicable legal norms.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Valuation basis for compensation of heritable building rights on rubble properties under § 3 EntschG: The dispute concerned compensation law, specifically challenging the valuation basis for an erbbaurecht (heritable building right) established on a "Trümmergrundstück" (rubble property), with the central issue being the interpretation of the meaning of § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 4 and Nr. 5 of the Compensation Act (EntschG). The court decided that the question of the correct assessment basis for such compensation holds fundamental significance, necessitating a higher-level ruling to clarify the applicable legal norms.

Keywords

AI generated
right of access in property interpretation of a judgment valuation proceedings fundamental rights right to remain established right

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the revision because the case has fundamental significance.
AI generated
5 C 3/10
Compensation valuation for expropriated building leasehold on a rubble property: classification of unimproved land under the German Compensation Act
V ZR 205/22
Valuation of amount in dispute for revocation of hereditary building right based on building value and annual rent
II B 9/18
Grunderwerbsteuer base: valuation of Erbbauzins claim under § 13 BewG and civil-law determination of index-adjusted rent
4 B 66/17
Calculation of redevelopment compensation and interpretation of the counterfactual baseline property value under § 154 BauGB
V ZR 179/20
Rehabilitation of property rights: statutory presumption of state approval for residential buildings and its non-rebuttable nature under the Real Property Rectification Act

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the revision because the case has fundamental significance.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revision; Entschädigungsrecht

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision gegen das Urteil des Verwaltungsgerichts Leipzig vom 27. Januar 2009 ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Die Revision kann Gelegenheit geben, die Frage der Bemessungsgrundlage der Entschädigung für ein Erbbaurecht an einem sog. Trümmergrundstück zu klären und zur Auslegung des Bedeutungsgehaltes des § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 4 und Nr. 5 EntschG beitragen.