Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
1 C 15/22, 1 C 15/22 (1 C 10/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2022:151122B1C15.22.0 AI generated

Withdrawal of revision and suspension of proceedings in administrative dispute

Case Number 1 C 15/22, 1 C 15/22 (1 C 10/19)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs Borne by public authority
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court ordered the suspension of the revision proceedings following the defendant's withdrawal of its appeal, a move that rendered the judgment of the Berlin Administrative Court of 30 January 2019 final and in force; consequently, the defendant bears the costs of the revision proceedings, with the exception of the auxiliary party's out-of-court costs, and the dispute value was set at €10,000. The case involved a review of an administrative court decision in a matter identified by subject matter only, where the procedural posture was determined solely by the appellant’s voluntary cessation of litigation. The decisive legal basis for the procedural termination and cost allocation is found in §§ 141 sentence 1, 125 paragraph 1 sentence 1, and 92 paragraph 3 sentence 1 of the Administrative Court Procedure Act (VwGO) in conjunction with §§ 155 paragraph 2 and 162 paragraph 3 VwGO, while the valuation of the dispute relied on § 47 paragraph 1 sentence 1 in conjunction with § 52 paragraph 1 of the Courts and Administrative Fees Act (GKG).

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 92 Abs. 3 Satz 1 VwGO, § 162 Abs. 3 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 141 Satz 1, § 125 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 92 Abs. 3 Satz 1 VwGO, § 155 Abs. 2 sowie § 162 Abs. 3 VwGO, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i. V. m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Withdrawal of revision and suspension of proceedings in administrative dispute: The case involved a review of an administrative court decision in a matter identified by subject matter only, where the procedural posture was determined solely by the appellant’s voluntary cessation of litigation. The decisive legal basis for the procedural termination and cost allocation is found in §§ 141 sentence 1, 125 paragraph 1 sentence 1, and 92 paragraph 3 sentence 1 of the Administrative Court Procedure Act (VwGO) in conjunction with §§ 155 paragraph 2 and 162 paragraph 3 VwGO, while the valuation of the dispute relied on § 47 paragraph 1 sentence 1 in conjunction with § 52 paragraph 1 of the Courts and Administrative Fees Act (GKG).

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of administrative act revision proceedings termination of proceedings matter in dispute administrative costs suspended sentence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 92 Abs. 3 Satz 1 VwGO
1 Satz 1, § 92 Abs. 3 Satz 1 VwGO einzustellen.
§ 162 Abs. 3 VwGO
2 sowie § 162 Abs. 3 VwGO.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Die Kostenentscheidung folgt aus § 155 Abs. 2 sowie § 162 Abs. 3 VwGO. Die Streitwertfestsetzung beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i. V. m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG.
§ 141 Satz 1, § 125 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 92 Abs. 3 Satz 1 VwGO
Basis for suspending the revision proceedings due to the defendant's withdrawal of the appeal.
§ 155 Abs. 2 sowie § 162 Abs. 3 VwGO
Basis for the allocation of costs of the revision proceedings to the defendant.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i. V. m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the determination of the dispute value in the revision proceedings.
AI generated
3 C 4/21, 3 C 4/21 (3 C 1/18)
Withdrawal of revision appeal; cost and dispute value determination under VwGO and GKG
5 B 11/13, 5 B 11/13, 5 PKH 14/13
Admissibility of revision challenging denial of procedural suspension under § 94 VwGO and refusal to rehear witnesses
4 B 21/22
Non-admission of revision for revision complaint: cross-referencing prior Senate decision to waive detailed justification under § 133 Abs. 5 VwGO
5 B 2.24
Suspension of revision proceedings pending anwaltstgerichtliche verification of counsel’s professional status
4 C 4/13
Effect of third-party objection on withdrawal of revision in administrative proceedings

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 141 Satz 1, § 125 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 92 Abs. 3 Satz 1 VwGO

Basis for suspending the revision proceedings due to the defendant's withdrawal of the appeal.

§ 155 Abs. 2 sowie § 162 Abs. 3 VwGO

Basis for the allocation of costs of the revision proceedings to the defendant.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i. V. m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the determination of the dispute value in the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Einstellungsbeschluss nach übereinstimmender Erledigung der Hauptsache

[TENOR]

Das Revisionsverfahren wird eingestellt.

Die Beklagte trägt die Kosten des Revisionsverfahrens mit Ausnahme der außergerichtlichen Kosten der Beigeladenen, die diese selbst trägt.

Der Wert des Streitgegenstandes wird für das Revisionsverfahren auf 10 000 € festgesetzt.

[GRUENDE]

Die Beklagte hat ihre Revision gegen das Urteil des Verwaltungsgerichts Berlin vom 30. Januar 2019 mit Schriftsatz vom 11. November 2022 zurückgenommen. Das Revisionsverfahren ist deshalb gemäß § 141 Satz 1, § 125 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 92 Abs. 3 Satz 1 VwGO einzustellen.

Die Kostenentscheidung folgt aus § 155 Abs. 2 sowie § 162 Abs. 3 VwGO. Die Streitwertfestsetzung beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i. V. m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG.