Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
4 BN 34/19, 4 BN 34/19 (4 CN 9/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:121219B4BN34.19.0 AI generated

Norm control against zoning plans: Applicability of UmwRG pleading deadlines to post-amendment applications

Case Number 4 BN 34/19, 4 BN 34/19 (4 CN 9/19)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) allowed the appeal and referred the matter to the higher regional administrative court, granting the appellant's request for leave to appeal (Revisionszulassung). The dispute concerned a norm control action under § 47(1)(1) VwGO against an amended zoning plan (Bebauungsplan), specifically raising the question of whether the deadline for pleading the cause of action prescribed by § 6 UmwRG applies when the application was filed after the entry into force of the Act adapting the Environmental Legal Remedies Act (Umwelt-Rechtsbehelfsgesetz) of May 29, 2017. The court based its decision on § 132(2)(1) VwGO, finding that the revision contributes to clarifying this unresolved legal issue, and set the provisional dispute value for the revision proceedings pursuant to § 47(1) sentence 1, § 52(1), and § 63(1) sentence 1 GKG.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 47 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Norm control against zoning plans: Applicability of UmwRG pleading deadlines to post-amendment applications: The dispute concerned a norm control action under § 47(1)(1) VwGO against an amended zoning plan (Bebauungsplan), specifically raising the question of whether the deadline for pleading the cause of action prescribed by § 6 UmwRG applies when the application was filed after the entry into force of the Act adapting the Environmental Legal Remedies Act (Umwelt-Rechtsbehelfsgesetz) of May 29, 2017. The court based its decision on § 132(2)(1) VwGO, finding that the revision contributes to clarifying this unresolved legal issue, and set the provisional dispute value for the revision proceedings pursuant to § 47(1) sentence 1, § 52(1), and § 63(1) sentence 1 GKG.

Keywords

AI generated
revision of zoning plan revision proceedings matter in dispute transitional provisions cause of action procedural deadline

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
The main legal ground cited for allowing the appeal (Revisionszulassung) due to the need to clarify the question of the pleading deadline in norm control proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 VwGO
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provision cited in the dispositive for setting the provisional dispute value in the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provision cited in the dispositive for setting the provisional dispute value in the revision proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Provision cited in the dispositive for setting the provisional dispute value in the revision proceedings.
AI generated
4 CN 9/19
Zoning plan challenge: Exclusion of the § 6 UmwRG ten-week justification deadline from administrative norm control proceedings
4 BN 18/14
Standing in norm control against zoning plans based on procedural promulgation during a citizens' initiative; interpretation of "complete judgment" for appeal deadlines
4 CN 3/15
Norm Control Deadline for Zoning Plans: Extension Not Triggered by Subsequent Loss of Effectiveness
4 BN 9/21
Application of the one-year norm control deadline to zoning plans rendered ineffective by post-promulgation functional deficiency
4 BN 20/19, 4 BN 20/19 (4 CN 3/19)
Norm control admissibility of zoning plan objections filed before statutory repeal of § 47 Abs. 2a VwGO

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

The main legal ground cited for allowing the appeal (Revisionszulassung) due to the need to clarify the question of the pleading deadline in norm control proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provision cited in the dispositive for setting the provisional dispute value in the revision proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Provision cited in the dispositive for setting the provisional dispute value in the revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provision cited in the dispositive for setting the provisional dispute value in the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Anwendbarkeit von § 6 UmwRG in Normenkontrollverfahren gegen Bebauungspläne

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerden sind begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Frage beitragen kann, ob in Normenkontrollverfahren nach § 47 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 VwGO gegen einen (Änderungs-)Bebauungsplan die Klagebegründungsfrist gemäß § 6 UmwRG zu beachten ist, wenn der Normenkontrollantrag nach Inkrafttreten des Gesetzes zur Anpassung des Umwelt-Rechtsbehelfsgesetzes und anderer Vorschriften an europa- und völkerrechtliche Vorgaben vom 29. Mai 2017 (BGBl. I S. 1298) gestellt worden ist.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.