Legislator Case Law & Legislation
2 WNB 3/19, 2 WNB 3/19 (2 WRB 1/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:051119B2WNB3.19.0 AI generated

Military disciplinary law: Effect of late-hour complaint filing to garrison duty officer on statutory deadline preservation

Case Number 2 WNB 3/19, 2 WNB 3/19 (2 WRB 1/19)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the service member's legal complaint, ruling in his favor on the procedural motion to allow the appeal to proceed to the merits, thereby setting aside the lower court's rejection of the complaint as inadmissible. The dispute concerned a military disciplinary proceeding in which the superior officer filed a disciplinary complaint at the officer on duty of the garrison after regular working hours had ended, rather than through the competent disciplinary authority, raising the issue of whether this action constituted a time-limit preserving filing under § 6 Abs. 1 WBO. The court determined that the case presents a question of fundamental legal significance requiring clarification of whether and under what conditions a disciplinary superior, who is absent after work hours, must be credited with the filing submitted to the garrison's officer on duty as a valid legal entry that meets the statutory deadline.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 22a Abs. 1, Abs. 2 Nr. 1 WBO, § 22b Abs. 4 Satz 1 WBO; Military disciplinary law: Effect of late-hour complaint filing to garrison duty officer on statutory deadline preservation: The dispute concerned a military disciplinary proceeding in which the superior officer filed a disciplinary complaint at the officer on duty of the garrison after regular working hours had ended, rather than through the competent disciplinary authority, raising the issue of whether this action constituted a time-limit preserving filing under § 6 Abs. 1 WBO. The court determined that the case presents a question of fundamental legal significance requiring clarification of whether and under what conditions a disciplinary superior, who is absent after work hours, must be credited with the filing submitted to the garrison's officer on duty as a valid legal entry that meets the statutory deadline.

Keywords

AI generated
military disciplinary law procedural deadline administrative complaint time limit in hours military service rulings determining validity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 22a Abs. 1, Abs. 2 Nr. 1 WBO

Main legal basis for the admission of the legal complaint (Rechtsbeschwerde) due to a question of fundamental significance.

§ 22b Abs. 4 Satz 1 WBO

Procedural basis for the panel composition without lay judges to decide on the admissibility of the legal complaint.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Zulassung der Rechtsbeschwerde in Fristfragen

[GRUENDE]

Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers, über die der Senat gemäß § 22b Abs. 4 Satz 1 WBO in der Besetzung ohne ehrenamtliche Richter entscheidet, ist gemäß § 22a Abs. 1, Abs. 2 Nr. 1 WBO zuzulassen. Die vorliegende Rechtssache kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der grundsätzlichen Frage geben, ob und unter welchen Voraussetzungen sich ein nach Dienstschluss abwesender Disziplinarvorgesetzter die Abgabe einer Beschwerde beim Offizier vom Wachdienst der Kaserne im Rahmen des § 6 Abs. 1 WBO als fristwahrende Einlegung zurechnen lassen muss.