Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
4 BN 27/19, 4 BN 27/19 (4 CN 7/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:250919B4BN27.19.0 AI generated

Grant of revision for subsequent divergence from prior case law

Case Number 4 BN 27/19, 4 BN 27/19 (4 CN 7/19)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court granted the complaint for leave to appeal and ordered the admission of the revision proceedings, effectively prevailing for the appellant at this procedural stage. The dispute concerned a legal divergence, specifically where the judgment under challenge deviated from the Senate's own decision of June 6, 2019 (B 4 CN 7.18). The decisive legal basis for this outcome was § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, which mandates the admission of revision in cases of subsequent divergence from a higher court's precedent, with the procedural cost and value assessment governed by §§ 47, 52, and 63 GKG.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Grant of revision for subsequent divergence from prior case law: The dispute concerned a legal divergence, specifically where the judgment under challenge deviated from the Senate's own decision of June 6, 2019 (B 4 CN 7.18). The decisive legal basis for this outcome was § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, which mandates the admission of revision in cases of subsequent divergence from a higher court's precedent, with the procedural cost and value assessment governed by §§ 47, 52, and 63 GKG.

Keywords

AI generated
revision of a judgment prior administrative complaint value in dispute procedural orders justification of legal divergence provisional admission

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO
Legal basis for admitting the revision due to subsequent divergence from the Senate's previous decision.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
AI generated
4 B 67/09, 4 B 67/09 (4 C 7/10)
Admission of revision due to divergence from established case law on construction law interpretation
4 BN 41/18
Admissibility of revision complaint: divergence ground requiring precise contrast of substantive legal propositions rather than editorial summaries
4 B 21/22
Non-admission of revision for revision complaint: cross-referencing prior Senate decision to waive detailed justification under § 133 Abs. 5 VwGO
10 B 15/15
Admissibility of revision for divergence and claim amendments in declaratory actions against chamber officials regarding affiliated association statements
5 B 32/18 D
Non-Admissibility of Revision: Specificity Requirements for Fundamental Significance, Divergence, and Procedural Errors in Compensation Claims for Excessive Proceedings

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO

Legal basis for admitting the revision due to subsequent divergence from the Senate's previous decision.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung wegen nachträglicher Divergenz

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO wegen nachträglicher Abweichung des angefochtenen Urteils von der Entscheidung des Senats vom 6. Juni 2019 - BVerwG 4 CN 7.18 - zuzulassen.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.