Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
4 B 4/19, 4 B 4/19 (4 C 6/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:180919B4B4.19.0 AI generated

Appropriateness of private redevelopment services in urban planning agreements under § 11 Abs. 2 BauGB

Case Number 4 B 4/19, 4 B 4/19 (4 C 6/19)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the plaintiff's appeal to the revision court, allowing the case to proceed on the basis of § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, while tentatively fixing the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings under §§ 47 Abs. 1, 53 Abs. 3 GKG. The dispute concerns the appropriateness of contractual services in an urban planning agreement, specifically challenging the arrangement where a private individual acquired land from a third party and undertook the urban redevelopment on its own cost, while the municipality received compensation payments from the third party pursuant to § 154 Abs. 1 BauGB. The decisive legal issue for the upcoming revision is determining the prerequisites under which such agreed services are considered appropriate within the meaning of § 11 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BauGB in light of the totality of circumstances, including the interplay between private investment and municipal compensation claims.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 11 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BauGB, § 154 Abs. 1 BauGB, § 53 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 53 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG; Appropriateness of private redevelopment services in urban planning agreements under § 11 Abs. 2 BauGB: 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, while tentatively fixing the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings under §§ 47 Abs. 1, 53 Abs. 3 GKG. The dispute concerns the appropriateness of contractual services in an urban planning agreement, specifically challenging the arrangement where a private individual acquired land from a third party and undertook the urban redevelopment on its own cost, while the municipality received compensation payments from the third party pursuant to § 154 Abs. 1 BauGB. The decisive legal issue for the upcoming revision is determining the prerequisites under which such agreed services are considered appropriate within the meaning of § 11 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BauGB in light of the totality of circumstances, including the interplay between private investment and municipal compensation claims.

Keywords

AI generated
urban planning municipal land revision proceedings private investment land use regulation building permit conditions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main legal basis for the admission of the revision appeal due to legal significance.
§ 11 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BauGB
§ 154 Abs. 1 BauGB
2 Satz 1 BauGB sind, wenn ein Privater gegenüber der Gemeinde auf eigene Kosten die städtebauliche Sanierung der Grundstücke im Sanierungsgebiet übernimmt, die er zuvor von einem Dritten erworben hat, und die Gemeinde von dem Dritten Ausgleichsbeträge nach § 154 Abs. 1 BauGB erhält.
§ 53 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG
1, § 53 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 53 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural rules cited for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
AI generated
4 BN 42/18
Sufficiency of informal urban planning measures for preemption statutes under § 25 BauGB: individual case assessment bars abstract legal clarification
4 BN 60/20
Municipal pre-emption ordinance validity: requirement of objective urban planning feasibility and genuine public interest under § 25 BauGB
4 BN 23/11, 4 BN 23/11 (4 CN 6/11)
Urban Planning Justification for Strengthening Central Service Areas: Requirements for Land-Use Plan Determinations
4 BN 35/18
Urban renewal statute invalidity: documentation requirements for balancing public and private interests under § 136 Abs. 4 Satz 3 BauGB
4 B 26/18
Appropriateness of outer-area residential expansion for home office under § 35 Abs. 4 S. 1 Nr. 5 b BauGB and objective assessment of living space needs

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main legal basis for the admission of the revision appeal due to legal significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 53 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural rules cited for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Angemessenheit der Leistungen in einem städtebaulichen Vertrag

[GRUENDE]

Auf die Beschwerde des Klägers wird die Revision nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zugelassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, unter welchen Voraussetzungen die vereinbarten Leistungen in einem städtebaulichen Vertrag den gesamten Umständen nach angemessen im Sinne von § 11 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BauGB sind, wenn ein Privater gegenüber der Gemeinde auf eigene Kosten die städtebauliche Sanierung der Grundstücke im Sanierungsgebiet übernimmt, die er zuvor von einem Dritten erworben hat, und die Gemeinde von dem Dritten Ausgleichsbeträge nach § 154 Abs. 1 BauGB erhält.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 53 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG.