Legislator Case Law & Legislation
4 B 36/18, 4 B 36/18 (4 C 1/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:280519B4B36.18.0 AI generated

Fictitious consent under § 36 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BauGB in immission control authorization proceedings

Case Number 4 B 36/18, 4 B 36/18 (4 C 1/19)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the complainant's leave to appeal, ordering that the Revisionsverfahren proceed to clarify the legal issues, while a provisional amount in dispute was set. The dispute concerned the application of the fictitious consent mechanism under § 36 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BauGB within the context of an immission control authorization procedure. The court based its decision on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, finding that the matter contributes to the clarification of the prerequisites for fictitious consent in such proceedings, and calculated the value of the case in dispute according to §§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, 52 Abs. 1, and 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 36 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BauGB, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Fictitious consent under § 36 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BauGB in immission control authorization proceedings: The dispute concerned the application of the fictitious consent mechanism under § 36 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BauGB within the context of an immission control authorization procedure. The court based its decision on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, finding that the matter contributes to the clarification of the prerequisites for fictitious consent in such proceedings, and calculated the value of the case in dispute according to §§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, 52 Abs. 1, and 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Keywords

AI generated
matter in dispute authorization to sue waiver of right implied consent administrative procedure prohibition of excessive immissions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 36 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BauGB
Revisionszulassung; Einvernehmensfiktion nach § 36 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BauGB im immissionsschutzrechtlichen Genehmigungsverfahren
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Grounds for the allowance of the appeal to the Federal Administrative Court.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Grounds for the allowance of the appeal to the Federal Administrative Court.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Einvernehmensfiktion nach § 36 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BauGB im immissionsschutzrechtlichen Genehmigungsverfahren

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen der Einvernehmensfiktion nach § 36 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BauGB im immissionsschutzrechtlichen Genehmigungsverfahren beitragen kann.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.