Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
4 B 62/18, 4 B 62/18 (4 C 3/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:280619B4B62.18.0 AI generated

Duty of Consideration and Priority Principle for Mutually Interfering Wind Energy Installations Subject to Different Permit Procedures

Case Number 4 B 62/18, 4 B 62/18 (4 C 3/19)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the revision appeal of the associated party under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO, thereby overturning the lower court's dismissal and setting the provisional value in dispute for the appellate phase. The dispute concerns a conflict between two mutually interfering wind energy installations, specifically regarding whether one turbine must defer to the other's impact on turbulence, arising from a challenge to an administrative decision where one facility underwent a pre-permit procedure and the other a full licensing procedure. The decisive legal issue centers on the application of the duty of consideration and the priority principle in balancing competing wind energy projects, requiring clarification of which installation must accommodate the other's operational impacts.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Duty of Consideration and Priority Principle for Mutually Interfering Wind Energy Installations Subject to Different Permit Procedures: 1 VwGO, thereby overturning the lower court's dismissal and setting the provisional value in dispute for the appellate phase. The dispute concerns a conflict between two mutually interfering wind energy installations, specifically regarding whether one turbine must defer to the other's impact on turbulence, arising from a challenge to an administrative decision where one facility underwent a pre-permit procedure and the other a full licensing procedure. The decisive legal issue centers on the application of the duty of consideration and the priority principle in balancing competing wind energy projects, requiring clarification of which installation must accommodate the other's operational impacts.

Keywords

AI generated
challenge of administrative decisions grounds for revision wind energy consideration of applications value in dispute licensing procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for allowing the revision appeal due to the need to clarify a significant legal question.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision procedure.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision procedure.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision procedure.
AI generated
4 B 63/18, 4 B 63/18 (4 C 4/19)
Wind energy mutual interference: obligation of consideration between competing installations and priority rule in mixed authorization proceedings
4 C 3/19
Priority principle for wind turbines: applicability of first-in-time review to conflicts between preliminary approval and final permit
7 B 12/23
Priority between competing wind energy permits and binding effect of aviation authority consent on immission control approvals
4 BN 12/12, 4 BN 12/12 (4 CN 2/12)
Admissibility of revision: standards for balancing public and private interests in wind energy concentration area planning
7 B 5.25
Wind energy permit priority and planning plan invalidity via integrated normative control reasoning

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for allowing the revision appeal due to the need to clarify a significant legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision procedure.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision procedure.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision procedure.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Rücksichtnahmegebot bei zwei sich gegenseitig beeinträchtigenden Windenergieanlagen

[GRUENDE]

Auf die Beschwerde der Beigeladenen wird die Revision nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zugelassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, welche von zwei sich gegenseitig beeinträchtigenden Windenergieanlagen im Hinblick auf Turbulenzen auf die jeweils andere Rücksicht nehmen muss, insbesondere ob und ggf. nach welchen Maßgaben der Grundsatz der Priorität Anwendung findet, wenn für die eine Anlage ein Verfahren zum Erlass eines Vorbescheides und für die andere ein Genehmigungsverfahren durchgeführt wird.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.