Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
3 B 57/16, 3 B 57/16 (3 C 29/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:131217B3B57.16.0 AI generated

Claim for regulatory compensation of revenue deficits under EU Regulation No 1370/2007 due to implementation of an integrated fare system

Case Number 3 B 57/16, 3 B 57/16 (3 C 29/17)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court admitted an appeal to the senate, finding the case to be of fundamental significance, thereby allowing the appellate review to proceed; the dispute concerns a public transport operator’s claim for the enactment of a general provision to offset revenue deficits caused by an authority’s planned implementation of an integrated fare system, rather than a final judgment on the merits at this procedural stage. The decisive legal basis involves the question of whether a carrier is entitled to a compensatory regulatory measure under Article 3(2) and (3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 concerning public passenger transport services.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 GKG; Claim for regulatory compensation of revenue deficits under EU Regulation No 1370/2007 due to implementation of an integrated fare system: The decisive legal basis involves the question of whether a carrier is entitled to a compensatory regulatory measure under Article 3(2) and (3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 concerning public passenger transport services.

Keywords

AI generated
public transport public authorities provision of services legal systems action by staff compensation and assistance to passengers

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the appeal due to the question of fundamental significance.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.
§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.
AI generated
10 C 3/19
Equivalence of general provisions and public service contracts for compensating non-remunerative public transport tariffs under Regulation (EC) 1370/2007
3 C 28/11
Calculating compensation for reduced revenue in vocational education transport: applying approved subscription prices and excluding separable network-opening fees under § 45a PBefG
3 B 20/11, 3 B 20/11 (3 C 28/11)
Compensation calculation for student monthly tickets under § 45a PBefG: deductibility of revenue from network access rides outside school hours and routes
KZR 12/15
Suspension of litigation over excessive railway station fees pending regulatory review; directive-compatible exclusion of judicial fairness control under § 315 BGB
1 BvR 1417/10
Lump-sum compensation for free public transport of severely disabled passengers: validity of mandatory co-payment under § 148 para. 5 SGB IX under Art. 12 and 3 GG

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the appeal due to the question of fundamental significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Erlass einer allgemeinen Vorschrift durch Verkehrsunternehmen

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zu. Die Revision wird dem Senat voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben, unter anderem die Frage zu klären, ob ein Verkehrsunternehmen einen Anspruch auf den Erlass einer allgemeinen Vorschrift nach Art. 3 Abs. 2 und 3 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1370/2007 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 23. Oktober 2007 über öffentliche Personenverkehrsdienste auf Schiene und Straße und zur Aufhebung der Verordnungen (EWG) Nr. 1191/69 und EWG Nr. 1107/70 des Rates hat, wenn dies notwendig ist, um Mindereinnahmen auszugleichen, die sich aus der vom Aufgabenträger vorgesehenen Anwendung eines Verbundtarifs ergeben.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.