Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
4 B 47/15, 4 B 47/15 (4 C 9/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:201217B4B47.15.0 AI generated

Compensation for mining property restrictions imposed by nature conservation regulations

Case Number 4 B 47/15, 4 B 47/15 (4 C 9/17)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to appeal for the plaintiff in a dispute concerning the appropriate monetary compensation for restrictions on mining property rights imposed by a nature conservation area regulation. The court found the complaint against the lower court's denial of admission to be well-founded, ordering that the case proceed to the full revision proceedings on the merits, where the core legal question is under what federal law conditions such conservation-based limitations to mining ownership necessitate adequate financial compensation. The decisive legal basis for this procedural decision is § 132(2)(1) of the Administrative Court Procedure Act (VwGO), which permits admission where the case contributes to the further clarification of a significant legal issue, specifically the interplay between mining property rights and statutory nature conservation protections.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Compensation for mining property restrictions imposed by nature conservation regulations: The court found the complaint against the lower court's denial of admission to be well-founded, ordering that the case proceed to the full revision proceedings on the merits, where the core legal question is under what federal law conditions such conservation-based limitations to mining ownership necessitate adequate financial compensation. The decisive legal basis for this procedural decision is § 132(2)(1) of the Administrative Court Procedure Act (VwGO), which permits admission where the case contributes to the further clarification of a significant legal issue, specifically the interplay between mining property rights and statutory nature conservation protections.

Keywords

AI generated
nature conservation permit grounds for revision restriction of property ownership statutory grounds procedural limitations administrative complaint

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for granting leave to appeal the denial of leave to file a revision, based on the significance of the legal question.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Cost-related provision cited in the final order regarding the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provisional statutory basis for the determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwert) for the revision proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural provision cited in conjunction with the provisional fixation of the amount in dispute.
AI generated
4 C 9/17
Compensability of unconstitutional deprivation of mining property rights due to nature conservation restrictions
10 BN 3/23
Challenge to nature reserve ordinance restricting mining via Natura 2000 implementation and property proportionality
7 B 43/15
Mining plan approval in prohibited forest: binding nature of specific sectoral laws and exclusion of cumulative public interest balancing under § 48 BBergG
10 B 9/24, 10 B 9/24 (10 C 6/24)
Revision admission on destruction and compensation of natural retention areas under Water Management Act
7 B 68/11
Mining Plan Approval and FFH Site Boundary Exclusion Under German Mining and EU Habitats Regulations

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for granting leave to appeal the denial of leave to file a revision, based on the significance of the legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provisional statutory basis for the determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwert) for the revision proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural provision cited in conjunction with the provisional fixation of the amount in dispute.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Cost-related provision cited in the final order regarding the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; angemessene Entschädigung für Einschränkung von Bergwerkeigentum aufgrund von Naturschutzgebietsverordnung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann zur weiteren Klärung der Frage beitragen, unter welchen Voraussetzungen für Beschränkungen des Bergwerkseigentums, die sich auf Grund einer Naturschutzgebietsverordnung ergeben, eine angemessene Entschädigung in Geld bundesrechtlich geboten ist.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.