Legislator Case Law & Legislation
3 B 52/16, 3 B 52/16 (3 C 19/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:190717B3B52.16.0 AI generated

Legal effect of revoking licensing authority approval on subsequent supervisory organization’s withdrawal of inspection engineer appointment

Case Number 3 B 52/16, 3 B 52/16 (3 C 19/17)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court permitted the appellant’s appeal on points of law (Revision), finding that the case holds fundamental legal significance, thereby allowing the matter to proceed to the full court for a substantive decision; the dispute concerns the legal effects of a revocation of the authorization required for appointment as an inspection engineer under Annex VIII b No. 3.7 to the Vehicle Licensing Regulations, specifically how this revocation by the licensing authority impacts the subsequent decision by the supervisory organization to withdraw the appointment; the decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, with the provisional dispute value determined under §§ 47, 52, and 63 GKG.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Legal effect of revoking licensing authority approval on subsequent supervisory organization’s withdrawal of inspection engineer appointment: 3.7 to the Vehicle Licensing Regulations, specifically how this revocation by the licensing authority impacts the subsequent decision by the supervisory organization to withdraw the appointment; the decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, with the provisional dispute value determined under §§ 47, 52, and 63 GKG.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative revocation of decision licensing procedure matter in dispute appointing authority official authorization or approval inspection contract

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Grounds for allowing the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental significance of the case.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Grounds for allowing the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental significance of the case.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Widerruf einer Zustimmung zur Betrauung; Prüfingenieur

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zu. Das Revisionsverfahren wird dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht voraussichtlich Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, welche rechtliche Wirkung der Widerruf der gemäß Nr. 3.7 der Anlage VIII b zur Straßenverkehrs-Zulassungs-Ordnung erforderlichen Zustimmung zur Betrauung mit den Aufgaben eines Prüfingenieurs seitens der Anerkennungsbehörde in Bezug auf die anschließende Entscheidung der Überwachungsorganisation hat, die Betrauung zu widerrufen.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.