Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
2 B 23/17, 2 B 23/17 (2 C 22/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:140617B2B23.17.0 AI generated

Forfeiture of Civil Servant Damages Claims for Delayed Promotion: Time and Circumstance Requirements

Case Number 2 B 23/17, 2 B 23/17 (2 C 22/17)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the appeal for further review, granting the plaintiff's challenge to the lower court's refusal to admit the appeal, on grounds of fundamental legal significance and divergence from the Koblenz Higher Administrative Court. The dispute concerns the requirements for the forfeiture (verwirkung) of a civil servant's claim for damages due to delayed or omitted promotion, specifically focusing on the applicable time and circumstance elements. The decision establishes the legal basis for the subsequent merits review, citing § 132(2) No. 1 and No. 2 VwGO in conjunction with § 127 No. 1 BRRG, and sets the preliminary dispute value according to § 63(1) and § 47(1), (3) GKG.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 6 GKG, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO i.V.m. § 127 Nr. 1 BRRG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 6 GKG; Forfeiture of Civil Servant Damages Claims for Delayed Promotion: Time and Circumstance Requirements: The dispute concerns the requirements for the forfeiture (verwirkung) of a civil servant's claim for damages due to delayed or omitted promotion, specifically focusing on the applicable time and circumstance elements. The decision establishes the legal basis for the subsequent merits review, citing § 132(2) No. 1 and No. 2 VwGO in conjunction with § 127 No. 1 BRRG, and sets the preliminary dispute value according to § 63(1) and § 47(1), (3) GKG.

Keywords

AI generated
forfeiture of administrative claim decisions on promotion challenge of administrative decisions civil dispute civil servant review on the merits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Primary legal basis cited in the dispositive for admitting the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the case.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO
1 VwGO) und wegen Divergenz (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO i.V.m.
§ 52 Abs. 6 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 6 GKG. Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 6 Satz 4 i.V.m. Satz 1 Nr. 1 GKG.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO i.V.m. § 127 Nr. 1 BRRG
Secondary legal basis cited in the dispositive for admitting the appeal due to divergence from another court's ruling.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 6 GKG
Provisions cited in the dispositive to determine the dispute value for the complaint proceedings.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
10 A 10738/14
Dezember 2014 - 10 A 10738/14.OVG - beurteilten Rechtsfragen zu entscheiden.
AI generated
2 B 55/16, 2 B 55/16 (2 C 21/17)
Forfeiture of civil servant's damages claim for delayed or omitted promotion: requirements for the time and circumstance elements of Verwirkung
2 B 54/16, 2 B 54/16 (2 C 19/17)
Waiver requirements for civil service damages claims based on delayed or omitted promotion: time and circumstance elements
2 B 9/10, 2 B 9/10 (2 C 6/11)
Public servant’s damages claim for delayed promotion: prerequisites for compensation under administrative career law
2 C 10/17
Forfeiture of a public servant's right to challenge a rival's promotion due to delayed assertion despite knowledge of regular promotion cycles
2 B 31/21
Delayed promotion damages barred by official’s duty to inquire and challenge competing appointments under § 839(3) BGB

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Primary legal basis cited in the dispositive for admitting the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the case.

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO i.V.m. § 127 Nr. 1 BRRG

Secondary legal basis cited in the dispositive for admitting the appeal due to divergence from another court's ruling.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 6 GKG

Provisions cited in the dispositive to determine the dispute value for the complaint proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 6 Satz 4 i.V.m. Satz 1 Nr. 1 GKG

Provisions cited in the dispositive to set the provisional dispute value for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Anforderungen an Zeit- und Umstandsmoment bei Verwirkung eines beamtenrechtlichen Schadensersatzanspruchs wegen verspäteter oder unterbliebener Beförderung

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision wird wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) und wegen Divergenz (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO i.V.m. § 127 Nr. 1 BRRG) zugelassen.

Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint geeignet, zur Klärung der von der Beschwerde aufgeworfenen Fragen beizutragen, welche Anforderungen an das Zeit- und das Umstandsmoment bei der Verwirkung eines beamtenrechtlichen Schadensersatzanspruchs wegen verspäteter oder unterbliebener Beförderung zu stellen sind. Gleichzeitig gibt das Revisionsverfahren dem Senat die Gelegenheit über die vom Berufungsgericht im angefochtenen Urteil abweichend vom Oberverwaltungsgericht Koblenz, Beschluss vom 18. Dezember 2014 - 10 A 10738/14.OVG - beurteilten Rechtsfragen zu entscheiden.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 6 GKG. Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 6 Satz 4 i.V.m. Satz 1 Nr. 1 GKG.