Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
2 B 55/16, 2 B 55/16 (2 C 21/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:140617B2B55.16.0 AI generated

Forfeiture of civil servant's damages claim for delayed or omitted promotion: requirements for the time and circumstance elements of Verwirkung

Case Number 2 B 55/16, 2 B 55/16 (2 C 21/17)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) admitted the appeal for revision, finding that the case possesses fundamental legal significance and involves a divergence from prior case law, thereby allowing the higher court to review the lower instance's judgment. The dispute concerns the forfeiture (Verwirkung) of a civil servant's tort claim for damages resulting from delayed or omitted promotion, specifically addressing the requirements for the time element (Zeitmoment) and circumstances element (Umstandsmoment). The decision highlights a conflict with the Higher Administrative Court of Koblenz regarding the applicable standards for these forfeiture conditions, necessitating clarification on the prerequisites for losing a beamtenrechtliche Schadensersatzanspruch due to undue delay in asserting the claim.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO i.V.m. § 127 Nr. 1 BRRG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 GKG; Forfeiture of civil servant's damages claim for delayed or omitted promotion: requirements for the time and circumstance elements of Verwirkung: The dispute concerns the forfeiture (Verwirkung) of a civil servant's tort claim for damages resulting from delayed or omitted promotion, specifically addressing the requirements for the time element (Zeitmoment) and circumstances element (Umstandsmoment). The decision highlights a conflict with the Higher Administrative Court of Koblenz regarding the applicable standards for these forfeiture conditions, necessitating clarification on the prerequisites for losing a beamtenrechtliche Schadensersatzanspruch due to undue delay in asserting the claim.

Keywords

AI generated
forfeiture of administrative claim revision of a judgment tort damages civil dispute decisions on promotion interpretation of the law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental legal significance of the case.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO
1 VwGO) und wegen Divergenz (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO i.V.m.
§ 52 Abs. 3 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 GKG. Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 GKG.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO i.V.m. § 127 Nr. 1 BRRG
Ground for admitting the revision due to a divergence in legal interpretation compared to prior case law.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
§ 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
10 A 10738/14
Dezember 2014 - 10 A 10738/14.OVG -, beurteilten Rechtsfragen zu entscheiden.
AI generated
2 B 23/17, 2 B 23/17 (2 C 22/17)
Forfeiture of Civil Servant Damages Claims for Delayed Promotion: Time and Circumstance Requirements
2 C 10/17
Forfeiture of a public servant's right to challenge a rival's promotion due to delayed assertion despite knowledge of regular promotion cycles
2 B 54/16, 2 B 54/16 (2 C 19/17)
Waiver requirements for civil service damages claims based on delayed or omitted promotion: time and circumstance elements
2 B 27/17, 2 B 27/17 (2 C 66/17)
Civil servant's damages claim for missed promotion: whether informal inquiries and legal remedies constitute "Rechtsmittel" under § 839(3) BGB
2 B 57/16, 2 B 57/16 (2 C 20/17)
Evidentiary weight of fax transmission reports and forfeiture requirements for civil service promotion claims

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental legal significance of the case.

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO i.V.m. § 127 Nr. 1 BRRG

Ground for admitting the revision due to a divergence in legal interpretation compared to prior case law.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Anforderungen an Zeit- und Umstandsmoment bei Verwirkung eines beamtenrechtlichen Schadensersatzanspruchs wegen verspäteter oder unterbliebener Beförderung

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision wird wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) und wegen Divergenz (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO i.V.m. § 127 Nr. 1 BRRG) zugelassen.

Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint geeignet, zur Klärung der von der Beschwerde aufgeworfenen Fragen beizutragen, welche Anforderungen an das Zeit- und das Umstandsmoment bei der Verwirkung eines beamtenrechtlichen Schadensersatzanspruchs wegen verspäteter oder unterbliebener Beförderung zu stellen sind. Gleichzeitig gibt das Revisionsverfahren dem Senat die Gelegenheit, über die vom Berufungsgericht im angefochtenen Urteil abweichend vom Oberverwaltungsgericht Koblenz, Beschluss vom 18. Dezember 2014 - 10 A 10738/14.OVG -, beurteilten Rechtsfragen zu entscheiden.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 GKG. Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 GKG.