Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
7 B 13/16, 7 B 13/16 (7 C 22/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:290617B7B13.16.0 AI generated

Admission of revision in nature conservation association litigation: objectionability of jurisdictional rules against a plan approval decision

Case Number 7 B 13/16, 7 B 13/16 (7 C 22/17)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) ordered the admission of the plaintiff’s appeal on points of law, finding the complaint admissible and substantiated, while simultaneously setting the value in dispute for both the complaint and revision proceedings. The case involves a nature conservation association bringing a procedural challenge (Vereinsklage) against a plan approval decision (Planfeststellungsbeschluss). The decisive legal basis for the admission is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which permits revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question: whether jurisdictional rules (Zuständigkeitsvorschriften) are subject to procedural objection (rügefähig) in association litigation concerning nature conservation plan approvals.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG; Admission of revision in nature conservation association litigation: objectionability of jurisdictional rules against a plan approval decision: The case involves a nature conservation association bringing a procedural challenge (Vereinsklage) against a plan approval decision (Planfeststellungsbeschluss). The decisive legal basis for the admission is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which permits revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question: whether jurisdictional rules (Zuständigkeitsvorschriften) are subject to procedural objection (rügefähig) in association litigation concerning nature conservation plan approvals.

Keywords

AI generated
nature conservation permit procedural objections challenge of administrative decisions grounds for revision value in dispute association

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding the objectionability of jurisdictional rules in association litigation.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Provision used to determine the value in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Provision used to determine the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
AI generated
9 B 10/10
Preclusion of nature conservation associations' species protection objections under § 61(3) BNatSchG requiring substantive critique of administrative findings during the plan approval procedure
9 A 21/11, 9 A 21/11 (9 A 12/10)
Hearing objection rejected: preclusion of habitat and species objections in plan approval proceedings
4 BN 39/20
Validity of detailed development plan under §§ 1, 1a, 132 VwGO: Mandatory determination of nature-protection avoidance measures via § 9 BauGB versus alternative compliance mechanisms
10 CN 1/23, 10 CN 1/23 (4 CN 4/18)
Standing of environmental association to challenge landscape protection ordinance under primacy of EU law and Aarhus Convention
4 BN 21/20
Bebauungsplan validity: weighting of nature conservation avoidance measures under § 1a Abs. 3 BauGB and their requirement for binding zoning determinations

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding the objectionability of jurisdictional rules in association litigation.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Provision used to determine the value in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Provision used to determine the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; naturschutzrechtliche Vereinsklage

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige Beschwerde des Klägers ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob bei einer naturschutzrechtlichen Vereinsklage gegen einen Planfeststellungsbeschluss Zuständigkeitsvorschriften rügefähig sind.

Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.