Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
7 B 9/16, 7 B 9/16 (7 C 16/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:110517B7B9.16.0 AI generated

Waste Management Act data reporting: Permissibility of demanding annual turnover from collection enterprises under § 18(2) No. 1 KrWG

Case Number 7 B 9/16, 7 B 9/16 (7 C 16/17)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the plaintiff's appeal and permitted an appeal to the Federal Court of Cassation on grounds of fundamental significance, finding the lower court's decision sufficient to warrant further review. The dispute concerned an administrative challenge regarding the data reporting obligations of a waste collection company, specifically whether authorities could legally demand the annual turnover of the entity in addition to other required information under waste management regulations. The decisive legal issue identified was whether Section 18(2) No. 1 of the Waste Management Act (KrWG) explicitly permits the federal states or competent authorities to require disclosure of a collection company's annual revenue, a question the higher court will need to clarify.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 sowie § 63 Abs. 1 GKG; Waste Management Act data reporting: Permissibility of demanding annual turnover from collection enterprises under § 18(2) No. 1 KrWG: The dispute concerned an administrative challenge regarding the data reporting obligations of a waste collection company, specifically whether authorities could legally demand the annual turnover of the entity in addition to other required information under waste management regulations. The decisive legal issue identified was whether Section 18(2) No. 1 of the Waste Management Act (KrWG) explicitly permits the federal states or competent authorities to require disclosure of a collection company's annual revenue, a question the higher court will need to clarify.

Keywords

AI generated
waste management turnover management report legal entity challenge of administrative decisions basis of obligation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main legal ground for permitting the appeal to the Federal Court of Justice on the basis of the fundamental importance of the case.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
1 sowie § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural provisions cited to determine the amount in dispute for the complaint procedure.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 sowie § 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural provisions cited to determine the amount in dispute for the appeal (revision) procedure.
AI generated
7 B 7/16, 7 B 7/16 (7 C 14/17)
Admission of revision on issue whether waste collection enterprises must disclose annual turnover under KrWG § 18 Abs. 2 Nr. 1
7 B 8/16, 7 B 8/16 (7 C 15/17)
Statutory basis for assessing the annual turnover of a waste management collection company
7 C 15/17
Ban on waste collection to enforce incomplete notification: limits of § 62 KrWG and requirements for turnover, route, and recycling data under § 18 KrWG
7 C 14/17
Scope of § 18 Abs. 2 KrWG notification requirements for small collectors and proportionality of collection bans under § 62 KrWG
7 B 26/11
Statutory interpretation of "commercial collection" under waste law and binding effect of prior appellate review on lower courts

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main legal ground for permitting the appeal to the Federal Court of Justice on the basis of the fundamental importance of the case.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural provisions cited to determine the amount in dispute for the complaint procedure.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 sowie § 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural provisions cited to determine the amount in dispute for the appeal (revision) procedure.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Angaben zum Jahresumsatz eines Sammlungsunternehmens

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige Beschwerde der Klägerin ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich jedenfalls zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob nach § 18 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 KrWG auch Angaben zum Jahresumsatz des Sammlungsunternehmens gefordert werden können.

Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 sowie § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.