Legislator Case Law & Legislation
4 BN 35/16, 4 BN 35/16 (4 CN 6/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:280217B4BN35.16.0 AI generated

Admissibility of Revision for Clarifying Permissibility of Combining Permanent and Holiday Residences in Special Zones under § 11 Abs. 1 BauNVO

Case Number 4 BN 35/16, 4 BN 35/16 (4 CN 6/17)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) admitted an appeal on points of law, granting the complainant's request and finding the appeal meritorious, thereby resolving the procedural status of the case in favor of the party challenging the lower court's refusal to permit review. The dispute concerned land-use planning law, specifically whether a special zone under the German Building Code could legally combine provisions for permanent residence and holiday housing. The decisive legal basis for the decision was § 132 Abs. 1 and § 133 Abs. 1 of the Administrative Procedure Act (VwGO), with the admissibility of the revision grounded in § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO due to the fundamental significance of the question regarding the permissibility of such zoning combinations under § 11 Abs. 1 of the Federal Building Ordinance (BauNVO).

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 133 Abs. 1 VwGO, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Admissibility of Revision for Clarifying Permissibility of Combining Permanent and Holiday Residences in Special Zones under § 11 Abs. 1 BauNVO: The dispute concerned land-use planning law, specifically whether a special zone under the German Building Code could legally combine provisions for permanent residence and holiday housing. The decisive legal basis for the decision was § 132 Abs. 1 and § 133 Abs. 1 of the Administrative Procedure Act (VwGO), with the admissibility of the revision grounded in § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO due to the fundamental significance of the question regarding the permissibility of such zoning combinations under § 11 Abs. 1 of the Federal Building Ordinance (BauNVO).

Keywords

AI generated
housing law residence permits building zone procedural revision building permit planning procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Provides the main ground for admitting the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO

Establishes the procedural basis for the admissibility of the complaint filed against the refusal to admit the revision.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Dauerwohnen und Ferienwohnen im Sondergebiet nach § 11 Abs. 1 BauNVO

[GRUENDE]

Die nach § 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO zulässige Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob eine Kombination von Dauerwohnen und Ferienwohnen in einem Sondergebiet nach § 11 Abs. 1 BauNVO festgesetzt werden kann.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.