Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
5 PB 8/16, 5 PB 8/16 (5 P 2/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:260117B5PB8.16.0 AI generated

Co-determination rights of the staff council in determining limited service capability and reducing working hours

Case Number 5 PB 8/16, 5 PB 8/16 (5 P 2/17)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the appellant's legal complaint to the Senate, finding it raised a fundamental legal question of decisive importance, but issued no substantive judgment on the merits. The dispute concerned whether the staff council holds a co-determination right under § 68(1) No. 6 of the Federal Personnel Representation Act in cases where an employee is deemed to have limited service capability and their working hours are subsequently reduced. The decision rests on § 95(2) of the Federal Personnel Representation Act in conjunction with § 92(1) sentence 2 and § 72(2) No. 1 of the Labor Court Act, which permit the admission of a complaint to clarify questions of fundamental significance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG; Co-determination rights of the staff council in determining limited service capability and reducing working hours: Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers ist gemäß § 95 Abs. 2 PersVG BB i.V.m. § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.

Keywords

AI generated
working hours rights and obligations of staff administrative personnel right to work fundamental rights legal representation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG
1 Satz 2, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.
AI generated
5 P 2/17
Co-determination rights of the staff council in reducing civil servant working hours for limited service capacity under German staff council law
5 PB 10/16, 5 PB 10/16 (5 P 4/17)
Co-decision rights of employee representation in determining limited fitness for service and reducing working hours
5 P 4/17
Staff Council Participation Rights in Reducing Working Hours Due to Limited Service Capability of Civil Servants
6 P 16/13
Co-determination of staff council for joint institution vs. transferring employer in assigning duties and function levels
6 PB 3/10
Co-determination of staff council over department-specific work instruction versus general order of conduct under personnel representation law

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Zulassung der Rechtsbeschwerde; Mitwirkung des Personalrates bei Feststellung der begrenzten Dienstfähigkeit und Herabsetzung der Arbeitszeit

[GRUENDE]

Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers ist gemäß § 95 Abs. 2 PersVG BB i.V.m. § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.

Die Rechtssache kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob im Falle der Feststellung der begrenzten Dienstfähigkeit und Herabsetzung der Arbeitszeit ein Mitwirkungsrecht des Personalrates gemäß § 68 Abs. 1 Nr. 6 PersVG BB besteht.