Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
5 PB 9/16, 5 PB 9/16 (5 P 3/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:260117B5PB9.16.0 AI generated

Personnel council participation rights in determining limited serviceability and reducing working hours under § 68(1) no. 6 PersVG BB

Case Number 5 PB 9/16, 5 PB 9/16 (5 P 3/17)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the applicant's legal complaint (Rechtsbeschwerde), ruling that the case is of fundamental legal significance. The dispute concerns whether the works council possesses a participation right (Mitwirkungsrecht) under § 68(1) no. 6 of the Federal Act on Personnel Councils (PersVG BB) when an agency determines limited serviceability and reduces an employee's working hours. The court relied on § 95(2) PersVG BB in conjunction with § 92(1) sentence 2 and § 72(2) no. 1 of the Labor Court Act (ArbGG) to permit the appeal, leaving the underlying administrative decision pending further review to clarify this specific labor law issue.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG, § 95 Abs. 2 PersVG BB, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG; Personnel council participation rights in determining limited serviceability and reducing working hours under § 68(1) no. 6 PersVG BB: The dispute concerns whether the works council possesses a participation right (Mitwirkungsrecht) under § 68(1) no. 6 of the Federal Act on Personnel Councils (PersVG BB) when an agency determines limited serviceability and reduces an employee's working hours. The court relied on § 95(2) PersVG BB in conjunction with § 92(1) sentence 2 and § 72(2) no. 1 of the Labor Court Act (ArbGG) to permit the appeal, leaving the underlying administrative decision pending further review to clarify this specific labor law issue.

Keywords

AI generated
working hours right to work administrative personnel fundamental rights work permit rights of civil servants

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG
1 Satz 2, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.
§ 95 Abs. 2 PersVG BB
Main ground for allowing the legal complaint due to a question of fundamental legal significance.
§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG
Procedural rules in conjunction with the personnel council act that form the basis for the admissibility of the complaint.
AI generated
5 P 3/17
Works council participation rights in reduced working hours for limited serviceability under § 27 BeamtStG: analogy to early retirement provision due to legislative gap
5 P 4/17
Staff Council Participation Rights in Reducing Working Hours Due to Limited Service Capability of Civil Servants
5 PB 10/16, 5 PB 10/16 (5 P 4/17)
Co-decision rights of employee representation in determining limited fitness for service and reducing working hours
5 P 2/17
Co-determination rights of the staff council in reducing civil servant working hours for limited service capacity under German staff council law
6 P 4/10
Works council participation rights for inter-departmental transfer of personnel powers as a general regulation under § 75 NdsPersVG and resulting claim for revocation

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 95 Abs. 2 PersVG BB

Main ground for allowing the legal complaint due to a question of fundamental legal significance.

§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG

Procedural rules in conjunction with the personnel council act that form the basis for the admissibility of the complaint.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Zulassung der Rechtsbeschwerde; Mitwirkung des Personalrates bei Feststellung der begrenzten Dienstfähigkeit und Herabsetzung der Arbeitszeit

[GRUENDE]

Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers ist gemäß § 95 Abs. 2 PersVG BB i.V.m. § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.

Die Rechtssache kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob im Falle der Feststellung der begrenzten Dienstfähigkeit und Herabsetzung der Arbeitszeit ein Mitwirkungsrecht des Personalrates gemäß § 68 Abs. 1 Nr. 6 PersVG BB besteht.