Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
3 B 21/16, 3 B 21/16 (3 C 4/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:090217B3B21.16.0 AI generated

Licensing requirement under the Passenger Transport Act for patient transport operated by an outpatient rehabilitation facility

Case Number 3 B 21/16, 3 B 21/16 (3 C 4/17)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal, finding that the case possesses fundamental significance, thereby allowing the subsequent full merits hearing to proceed. The dispute concerns the permissibility of a transport service operated by a provider of outpatient rehabilitation for transporting patients between their homes and the facility, specifically challenging the lower court's assessment of whether such a service constitutes a public passenger transport operation. The decisive legal question is whether a license under § 1(1) in conjunction with § 2(1) of the Passenger Transport Act (PBefG) is mandatory for this specific type of patient transport.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Licensing requirement under the Passenger Transport Act for patient transport operated by an outpatient rehabilitation facility: The dispute concerns the permissibility of a transport service operated by a provider of outpatient rehabilitation for transporting patients between their homes and the facility, specifically challenging the lower court's assessment of whether such a service constitutes a public passenger transport operation. The decisive legal question is whether a license under § 1(1) in conjunction with § 2(1) of the Passenger Transport Act (PBefG) is mandatory for this specific type of patient transport.

Keywords

AI generated
public transport rehabilitation facility public hearing medical care requirements general licence use of motor vehicle

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Ground for granting leave to appeal due to fundamental significance of the case.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the imposition of court fees in the revision procedure.
§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the preliminary determination of the matter in dispute for the revision procedure.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the calculation of court fees for the revision procedure.
AI generated
10 C 1/19
Patient transport service: licensing requirement and scope of “own vehicles” and “inpatient” exemptions under PBefG and FrStllgV
IV R 37/19
Scope of vehicle tax exemption for patient transport: medical necessity via prescription without requirement for on-board medical care or emergency response
IV R 41/19
Tax exemption for patient transport vehicles: sufficiency of medical prescriptions and exclusion of en-route care requirements
III R 47/18
Kraftfahrzeugsteuer: Krankenbeförderung requires medically ill passengers and treatment-related transport, not just disability
5 C 14/19
Reimbursement of travel costs for medical treatment requires a specific physician's order for transport, not just a treatment certificate, even when using a private vehicle.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Ground for granting leave to appeal due to fundamental significance of the case.

§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the preliminary determination of the matter in dispute for the revision procedure.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the calculation of court fees for the revision procedure.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the imposition of court fees in the revision procedure.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Erforderlichkeit einer Genehmigung für Fahrdienst

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zu. Das Revisionsverfahren wird dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht voraussichtlich Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, wann für einen Fahrdienst, den der Träger einer Einrichtung für ambulante Rehabilitation für den Transport der Patienten zwischen deren Wohnung und der Rehabilitationseinrichtung betreibt, eine Genehmigung nach § 1 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 2 Abs. 1 des Personenbeförderungsgesetzes erforderlich ist.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.