Legislator Case Law & Legislation
8 B 44/16, 8 B 44/16 (8 C 5/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:230117B8B44.16.0 AI generated

Admission of revision on whether restitution entitlements under the VermG cover companies located outside the former GDR at the time of damage

Case Number 8 B 44/16, 8 B 44/16 (8 C 5/17)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the defendant’s complaint and admitted the plaintiff’s revision appeal to the Senate, ordering the dispute to proceed to a full trial. The case concerns a challenge regarding the recognition of entitlements to shareholdings in companies under German denazification and restitution laws. The court held that the appeal raises a question of fundamental legal significance, specifically whether entitlements can be established for companies that were located outside the territory of the former GDR at the time of the relevant damage, pursuant to § 1(6) and § 3(1) sentence 4 half-sentence 2 of the Property Restoration Act (VermG).

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Admission of revision on whether restitution entitlements under the VermG cover companies located outside the former GDR at the time of damage: The case concerns a challenge regarding the recognition of entitlements to shareholdings in companies under German denazification and restitution laws. The court held that the appeal raises a question of fundamental legal significance, specifically whether entitlements can be established for companies that were located outside the territory of the former GDR at the time of the relevant damage, pursuant to § 1(6) and § 3(1) sentence 4 half-sentence 2 of the Property Restoration Act (VermG).

Keywords

AI generated
restitution of property revision of a judgment amendment of the claim administrative complaint provisional cover assessment of damages

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Legal basis cited for the admission of the appeal for revision due to fundamental importance.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Legal basis cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG
Legal basis cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Legal basis cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Legal basis cited for the admission of the appeal for revision due to fundamental importance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG

Legal basis cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Legal basis cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Legal basis cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Berechtigung für Beteiligungen an Unternehmen

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige Beschwerde der Beklagten ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren bietet voraussichtlich Gelegenheit zu klären, ob auf der Grundlage von § 1 Abs. 6, § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 VermG die Berechtigung für Beteiligungen an Unternehmen festgestellt werden kann, die zum Zeitpunkt der Schädigung ihren Sitz außerhalb des Beitrittsgebiets hatten.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.