Insufficiency of preliminary cost overview to establish financial viability for urban redevelopment resolution under § 149 BauGB

§ 149 BauGB, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Insufficiency of preliminary cost overview to establish financial viability for urban redevelopment resolution under § 149 BauGB: The dispute concerns a complaint against a lower court's refusal to admit an appeal on grounds of fundamental significance regarding a contested urban redevelopment (sanation) resolution. The case hinges on whether a preliminary cost and financing overview is legally sufficient under the German Federal Building Code to establish that the redevelopment objective is financially viable, a question the court deemed to have fundamental importance for legal clarification. The decision is based on the procedural norms of the Administrative Court Rules (§§ 132, 133 VwGO) and substantive building law principles concerning the financial feasibility requirement for urban development resolutions (§ 149 BauGB, §§ 136, 142 BauGB), with the court's preliminary assessment that the specific legal question requires resolution by the higher instance.