Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
2 B 114/15, 2 B 114/15 (2 C 26/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:200916B2B114.15.0 AI generated

Compensation of foreign on-call service as overwork offset by leisure time in public service

Case Number 2 B 114/15, 2 B 114/15 (2 C 26/16)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to appeal for the plaintiff, allowing the case to proceed to its revision proceeding, thereby prevailing in the procedural stage. The dispute concerns public service law, specifically the compensation of additional work performed in the form of on-call duty, which must be offset by leisure time, with a focus on obligations fulfilled during overseas service. The decision rests on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, establishing that the legal questions regarding the calculation of equivalent leisure time for foreign on-call service are of fundamental significance, as confirmed by the pendency of related revision proceedings before the same court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3 GKG; Compensation of foreign on-call service as overwork offset by leisure time in public service: The dispute concerns public service law, specifically the compensation of additional work performed in the form of on-call duty, which must be offset by leisure time, with a focus on obligations fulfilled during overseas service. The decision rests on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, establishing that the legal questions regarding the calculation of equivalent leisure time for foreign on-call service are of fundamental significance, as confirmed by the pendency of related revision proceedings before the same court.

Keywords

AI generated
on-call work service compensation legal working time foreign law public service method of calculation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Primary ground for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal questions regarding on-call duty compensation.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3 GKG
Procedural basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
AI generated
2 B 113/15, 2 B 113/15 (2 C 28/16)
Compensation of on-call duty excess work via leisure time: legal treatment of service performed abroad
2 B 115/15, 2 B 115/15 (2 C 22/15)
Overtime compensation for on-call duty performed abroad
2 B 112/15, 2 B 112/15 (2 C 23/15)
Compensatory leisure time for overseas on-call duty: Admissibility of revision due to fundamental legal significance
2 B 111/15, 2 B 111/15 (2 C 27/16)
Compensation of foreign standby duty via leisure time: fundamental significance of valuation rules for Revisionszulassung under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO
2 C 35/10
Civil servant's full time-off compensation for union-law-exceeding on-call duty: classification of ready service as working time under EU Working Time Directive

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Primary ground for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal questions regarding on-call duty compensation.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3 GKG

Procedural basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; durch Freizeit auszugleichende Mehrarbeit in Form von Bereitschaftsdienst insbesondere bei einer Dienstleistung im Ausland

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision der Klägerin ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung von Fragen geben, die sich im Zusammenhang mit durch Freizeit auszugleichender Mehrarbeit in Form von Bereitschaftsdienst stellen. Dies betrifft insbesondere die bei einer Dienstleistung im Ausland erbrachte Mehrarbeit. Zu diesen Fragen sind beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht weitere Revisionen anhängig (Verfahren BVerwG 2 C 21.15 bis 2 C 24.15, 2 C 28.15 und 2 C 3.16).

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3 GKG und entspricht der Streitwertfestsetzung des Berufungsgerichts.