Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
8 B 33/15, 8 B 33/15 (8 C 18/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:270716B8B33.15.0 AI generated

Definiteness of gambling prohibition order referencing statutory definition and requirements for graduated enforcement concepts

Case Number 8 B 33/15, 8 B 33/15 (8 C 18/16)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal for the complainant, finding that the case involves fundamental legal significance, thereby reversing the lower court's refusal and initiating a revision proceeding. The dispute concerns a gambling-related administrative prohibition order (Untersagungsverfügung), with the applicant challenging the legal validity of the measure. The decisive legal issues identified for the upcoming revision concern the specific requirements of definiteness under § 37 Abs. 1 VwVfG for administrative orders that merely reference the statutory definition of gambling under § 3 GlüStV, as well as the procedural requirements for a graduated enforcement approach, specifically whether the authority must possess and disclose a comprehensive concept or plan for targeting specific providers or provider groups.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Definiteness of gambling prohibition order referencing statutory definition and requirements for graduated enforcement concepts: The dispute concerns a gambling-related administrative prohibition order (Untersagungsverfügung), with the applicant challenging the legal validity of the measure. The decisive legal issues identified for the upcoming revision concern the specific requirements of definiteness under § 37 Abs. 1 VwVfG for administrative orders that merely reference the statutory definition of gambling under § 3 GlüStV, as well as the procedural requirements for a graduated enforcement approach, specifically whether the authority must possess and disclose a comprehensive concept or plan for targeting specific providers or provider groups.

Keywords

AI generated
order for enforcement statutory prohibition procedural requirement administrative authority forms of gambling rulings providing an interpretation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
The legal ground cited for granting leave to appeal on the basis of fundamental legal significance.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
The provisions cited as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
AI generated
8 C 14/16
Internet gambling ban: sufficiency of administrative order specificity and discretion reduced to zero
8 C 16/17
Limits of analogical application of administrative act revocation provisions to originally unlawful acts in gaming device suitability cases
8 B 44/12, 8 B 44/12 (8 C 40/12)
Scope of Gambling License Ban: Whether Lack of Eligibility Justifies Total Prohibition of Sports Betting
8 C 15/12
Fortsetzungsfeststellungsinteresse at an expired gambling prohibition lacking rehabilitation or state liability prospects
8 C 40/12
Continued declaratory interest for expired gambling prohibition under § 113 Abs. 1 Satz 4 VwGO and Art. 47 GRC

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

The legal ground cited for granting leave to appeal on the basis of fundamental legal significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

The provisions cited as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Bestimmtheit einer glücksspielrechtlichen Untersagungsverfügung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zu.

Das Revisionsverfahren bietet voraussichtlich Gelegenheit, die Voraussetzungen der Bestimmtheit (§ 37 Abs. 1 VwVfG) einer glücksspielrechtlichen Untersagungsverfügung, die gesetzeswiederholend auf die Begriffsdefinition des Glücksspiels des § 3 GlüStV verweist, näher zu präzisieren.

Darüber hinaus führt die Beschwerdebegründung voraussichtlich auf die Rechtsfrage, welche Anforderungen an ein abgestuftes Vorgehen der Behörde gegen einzelne Anbieter oder Anbietergruppen beim Erlass glücksspielrechtlicher Untersagungsverfügungen zu stellen sind insbesondere, ob ein Plan oder Gesamtkonzept für das behördliche Vorgehen vorliegen und gegebenenfalls, wie dieses beschaffen sein muss.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.