Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
4 BN 40/15, 4 BN 40/15 (4 CN 3/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:030316B4BN40.15.0 AI generated

Compatibility of the one-year exclusion period for challenging violations of the inter-municipal consultation duty in German building law with Union law

Case Number 4 BN 40/15, 4 BN 40/15 (4 CN 3/16)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant’s appeal and permitted an appeal on points of law against the lower court’s judgment, finding the appeal on points of law justified due to the fundamental significance of the case. The dispute concerned the compatibility of German building law with EU law, specifically challenging the provision that renders violations of the planning obligation to consult neighboring municipalities (under § 3(2) sentence 2 BauGB) unenforceable after a one-year exclusion period under § 215(1) no. 1 BauGB. The decisive legal basis for the decision was the criteria for permitting appeals on points of law under § 132(2) no. 1 VwGO, based on the open question of whether this strict time limit for challenging procedural planning errors violates the requirements of European Union law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 133 Abs. 1 VwGO, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 3 Abs. 2 Satz 2 Halbs. 1 BauGB, § 215 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 BauGB, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO; Compatibility of the one-year exclusion period for challenging violations of the inter-municipal consultation duty in German building law with Union law: The dispute concerned the compatibility of German building law with EU law, specifically challenging the provision that renders violations of the planning obligation to consult neighboring municipalities (under § 3(2) sentence 2 BauGB) unenforceable after a one-year exclusion period under § 215(1) no. 1 BauGB. The decisive legal basis for the decision was the criteria for permitting appeals on points of law under § 132(2) no. 1 VwGO, based on the open question of whether this strict time limit for challenging procedural planning errors violates the requirements of European Union law.

Keywords

AI generated
law of obligations procedural time limits grounds for exclusion obligation to build preliminary ruling procedure housing law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 133 Abs. 1 VwGO
1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO zulässige Beschwerde ist begründet.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
§ 3 Abs. 2 Satz 2 Halbs. 1 BauGB
Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob die Unbeachtlichkeit eines Verstoßes gegen die Anforderungen des § 3 Abs. 2 Satz 2 Halbs. 1 BauGB nach Ablauf der Jahresfrist des § 215 Abs.
§ 215 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 BauGB
1 BauGB nach Ablauf der Jahresfrist des § 215 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 BauGB mit den Anforderungen des Unionsrechts in Einklang steht.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO
Procedural basis establishing the admissibility of the complaint against the leave-to-appeal refusal.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.
AI generated
7 B 4/14, 7 B 4/14 (7 C 1/15)
Compatibility of statutory exclusion of environmental objections with EU law
4 C 24/13
Sanierungsrechtliche Ausgleichsbeträge: Festsetzungsverjährung bei formell unwirksamer Aufhebungssatzung
4 B 56/15
Wettbüro in allgemeinem Wohngebiet: Rücksichtnahmegebot und nichtrevisibles Landesrecht
4 B 11/15
Admissibility of review for divergence from Federal Administrative Court case law and general legal significance regarding the enduring preponderating influence of former buildings on neighborhood character under German building law.
7 B 19/14, 7 B 19/14 (7 C 17/15)
Compatibility of the Saarland exclusion of objections in administrative proceedings with EU law

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

§ 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO

Procedural basis establishing the admissibility of the complaint against the leave-to-appeal refusal.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Vereinbarkeit des Rügeausschlusses nach §§ 3 Abs. 2 Satz 2, 215 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 BauGB mit Unionsrecht

[GRUENDE]

Die nach § 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO zulässige Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob die Unbeachtlichkeit eines Verstoßes gegen die Anforderungen des § 3 Abs. 2 Satz 2 Halbs. 1 BauGB nach Ablauf der Jahresfrist des § 215 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 BauGB mit den Anforderungen des Unionsrechts in Einklang steht.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.