Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
3 B 21/15, 3 B 21/15 (3 C 3/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:030216B3B21.15.0 AI generated

Definition of "Zugehörigkeit" to East German supplementary pension systems under the Vocational Rehabilitation Act

Case Number 3 B 21/15, 3 B 21/15 (3 C 3/16)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court granted the plaintiff's leave to appeal, ruling that the case possesses fundamental legal significance and setting the minimum amount in dispute for the subsequent revision proceedings. The dispute concerned the plaintiff's application for the legal concept of "Zugehörigkeit" (affiliation) to an East German supplementary or special pension system under the Vocational Rehabilitation Act (BerRehaG). By admitting the appeal, the court indicated it will use the revision proceedings to precisely define this legal term, while determining that the plaintiff's potential economic benefit is low, thereby justifying the application of the minimum statutory amount in dispute.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 3 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, Anlage 2 zu § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 3 GKG; Definition of "Zugehörigkeit" to East German supplementary pension systems under the Vocational Rehabilitation Act: The dispute concerned the plaintiff's application for the legal concept of "Zugehörigkeit" (affiliation) to an East German supplementary or special pension system under the Vocational Rehabilitation Act (BerRehaG). By admitting the appeal, the court indicated it will use the revision proceedings to precisely define this legal term, while determining that the plaintiff's potential economic benefit is low, thereby justifying the application of the minimum statutory amount in dispute.

Keywords

AI generated
vocational rehabilitation pension revision supplementary pension statutory benefit application for revision special leave

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Basis for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the case.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 34 Abs. 1 Satz 3 GKG
Die Festsetzung des Mindeststreitwertes nach Anlage 2 zu § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 3 GKG ist angemessen, weil die wirtschaftlichen Auswirkungen eines Erfolgs des Revisionsverfahrens für den Kläger voraussichtlich gering sind.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provisions used to determine the provisional amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Anlage 2 zu § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 3 GKG
Basis for setting the minimum amount in dispute due to the expected low economic impact.
AI generated
B 5 R 36/11 R
Constitutional validity of excluding post-1936 GDR emigrants from FRG pension valuation under unified social security law
B 13 R 7/21 B
Valuation of East German pension periods for pre-1990 emigrants: FRG vs. RÜG application and failure to demonstrate fundamental significance of settled case law
B 5 R 334/11 B
Revocation of compensation pension: substantiation of general significance and admissibility of procedural complaints regarding MfS participation and deprivation of liberty
B 13 R 78/09 R
Erwerbsminderungsrente: continued applicability of referral occupation doctrine under § 43 SGB VI and scope of the general labor market
B 5 RS 7/09 R
Whether unvested supplementary pension entitlements in the former German state apparatus require formal membership declarations or arise solely from the objective nature of the employment under the Transition and Transfer Law

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Basis for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the case.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provisions used to determine the provisional amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Anlage 2 zu § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 3 GKG

Basis for setting the minimum amount in dispute due to the expected low economic impact.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Begriff "Zugehörigkeit" i.S.d. BerRehaG

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die von dem Kläger geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung zu (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO).

Das Revisionsverfahren wird dem Senat voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben, den Begriff der "Zugehörigkeit" zu einem Zusatz- oder Sonderversorgungssystem der DDR im Sinne des Beruflichen Rehabilitierungsgesetzes zu präzisieren.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG. Die Festsetzung des Mindeststreitwertes nach Anlage 2 zu § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 3 GKG ist angemessen, weil die wirtschaftlichen Auswirkungen eines Erfolgs des Revisionsverfahrens für den Kläger voraussichtlich gering sind.