Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
2 B 2/15, 2 B 2/15 (2 C 31/15) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:221215B2B2.15.0 AI generated

Legality of first-time ordinance issuance within complex regulatory changes: intersection of rule of law and democratic principles

Case Number 2 B 2/15, 2 B 2/15 (2 C 31/15)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) permitted an appeal on points of law (*Revision*) filed by the plaintiff, holding that the case possesses fundamental legal significance. This procedural decision allows the Revisionsgericht to hear the dispute challenging the initial enactment of an ordinance by the legislature within the context of modifying complex regulatory frameworks. The court did not render a final judgment on the merits in this *Beschluss* but authorized the higher review to determine whether the rule of law and democratic principles (*Rechtsstaats- und Demokratieprinzip*) prohibit such a legislative action. The decision is grounded in § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which governs the admission of appeals for questions of fundamental legal importance, with the value of the matter provisionally set in accordance with § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG; Legality of first-time ordinance issuance within complex regulatory changes: intersection of rule of law and democratic principles: This procedural decision allows the Revisionsgericht to hear the dispute challenging the initial enactment of an ordinance by the legislature within the context of modifying complex regulatory frameworks. The court did not render a final judgment on the merits in this *Beschluss* but authorized the higher review to determine whether the rule of law and democratic principles (*Rechtsstaats- und Demokratieprinzip*) prohibit such a legislative action. The decision is grounded in § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which governs the admission of appeals for questions of fundamental legal importance, with the value of the matter provisionally set in accordance with § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG.

Keywords

AI generated
democratic principles rule of law revision of a judgment framework decision procedural rules matter in dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, as the court explicitly cited this provision to permit the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental legal significance of the case.
§ 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG
§ 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG und entspricht der Wertfestsetzung des Berufungsgerichts.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive to establish the basis for the provisional determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
AI generated
8 B 72/11
Promulgation of public-law statutes: Textual identity with resolved content and limits of permissible corrections under the rule of law
4 BN 3/16, 4 BN 3/16 (4 CN 3/17)
Revisionszulassung: Bodenrechtliche Relevanz der Kosten- und Finanzierungsübersicht bei der Sanierungsbeschlussfassung
4 B 56/15
Wettbüro in allgemeinem Wohngebiet: Rücksichtnahmegebot und nichtrevisibles Landesrecht
8 B 5/11, 8 B 5/11 (8 C 7/11)
Municipal election review: Admissibility of asserting election legality versus unlawfulness under the constitutional principle of equal opportunity for political parties.
4 C 13/13
Sanierungsrechtlicher Ausgleichsbetrag: Förmlicher Abschluss der Sanierung als Abgabenstatbestand und Grenzen der verfassungskonformen Auslegung

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, as the court explicitly cited this provision to permit the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental legal significance of the case.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive to establish the basis for the provisional determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsstaats- und das Demokratieprinzip bei erstmaligem Erlass einer Verordnung im Rahmen der Änderung komplexer Regelungsgefüge; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision des Klägers ist zuzulassen, weil die Rechtssache grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO hat. Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint zur Klärung der sinngemäß aufgeworfenen Frage geeignet, ob das Rechtsstaats- und das Demokratieprinzip dem erstmaligen Erlass einer Verordnung durch den Gesetzgeber auch dann entgegenstehen, wenn diese Verordnung im Rahmen der Änderung komplexer Regelungsgefüge erlassen wird.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Werts des Streitgegenstandes für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG und entspricht der Wertfestsetzung des Berufungsgerichts.