Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
2 B 68/14, 2 B 68/14 (2 C 28/15) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:101215B2B68.14.0 AI generated

Admission of appeal on points of law regarding temporal extent of compensatory leave for lawful on-call overtime

Case Number 2 B 68/14, 2 B 68/14 (2 C 28/15)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court ordered the admission of the plaintiff's appeal on points of law, thereby allowing the case to proceed to the Supreme level of judicial review, with the interim amount in dispute set equal to that of the prior instance. The dispute centers on the temporal extent of compensatory leave required to offset lawful overtime performed in the form of on-call duty, a question identified as having fundamental legal significance due to pending related appeals from other defendants. The decision relies on § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO for the standard of admissibility and §§ 63(1) Sentence 1, 52(1)-(2) GKG for the calculation of the amount in dispute.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 und 2 GKG; Admission of appeal on points of law regarding temporal extent of compensatory leave for lawful on-call overtime: The dispute centers on the temporal extent of compensatory leave required to offset lawful overtime performed in the form of on-call duty, a question identified as having fundamental legal significance due to pending related appeals from other defendants. The decision relies on § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO for the standard of admissibility and §§ 63(1) Sentence 1, 52(1)-(2) GKG for the calculation of the amount in dispute.

Keywords

AI generated
on-call duty compensation for overtime judicial law procedural time limits right to compensatory damages appealable interlocutory decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
The main ground for the admission of the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding compensatory leave for on-call duty overtime.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 und 2 GKG
The procedural basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
AI generated
2 B 116/15, 2 B 116/15 (2 C 24/15)
Compensation for on-call duty overtime performed abroad
2 B 115/15, 2 B 115/15 (2 C 22/15)
Overtime compensation for on-call duty performed abroad
2 B 112/15, 2 B 112/15 (2 C 23/15)
Compensatory leisure time for overseas on-call duty: Admissibility of revision due to fundamental legal significance
2 B 113/15, 2 B 113/15 (2 C 28/16)
Compensation of on-call duty excess work via leisure time: legal treatment of service performed abroad
2 B 53/16
Monetary compensation for uncompensated military overtime and failure to substantiate fundamental significance for leave to appeal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

The main ground for the admission of the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding compensatory leave for on-call duty overtime.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 und 2 GKG

The procedural basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Zeitlicher Umfang von Freizeitausgleich bei rechtmäßiger Mehrarbeit im Bereitschaftsdienst; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision des Klägers ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, in welchem zeitlichen Umfang rechtmäßige Mehrarbeit in Form von Bereitschaftsdienst durch Freizeit auszugleichen ist. Zu dieser Frage sind beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht zwischenzeitlich - nach Zulassung der Revision durch das Oberverwaltungsgericht Münster - von der Beklagten des vorliegenden Verfahrens eingelegte weitere Revisionen anhängig geworden (Verfahren BVerwG 2 C 21.15 bis 2 C 24.15).

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 und 2 GKG und entspricht der Streitwertfestsetzung des Berufungsgerichts.