Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
4 BN 5/15, 4 BN 5/15 (4 CN 4/15) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:081015B4BN5.15.0 AI generated

Preclusion under § 47 Abs. 2 VwGO for objections based on facts arising after public display of a zoning plan

Case Number 4 BN 5/15, 4 BN 5/15 (4 CN 4/15)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted permission for an appeal on points of law, allowing the plaintiff's complaint to proceed to the revision stage for substantive review. The case involves a norm control action challenging a zoning plan (Bebauungsplan), centered on whether a claimant who made no objections during the public display period is precluded from raising new legal grounds under § 47 Abs. 2 VwGO when those grounds are based on factual circumstances that arose chronologically after the plan's public display. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which permits an appeal if the case has general legal significance, specifically to clarify the conditions under which such temporal preclusion applies in administrative norm control proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 47 Abs. 2 VwGO, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 132 Abs. 1 VwGO, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Preclusion under § 47 Abs. 2 VwGO for objections based on facts arising after public display of a zoning plan: The case involves a norm control action challenging a zoning plan (Bebauungsplan), centered on whether a claimant who made no objections during the public display period is precluded from raising new legal grounds under § 47 Abs. 2 VwGO when those grounds are based on factual circumstances that arose chronologically after the plan's public display. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which permits an appeal if the case has general legal significance, specifically to clarify the conditions under which such temporal preclusion applies in administrative norm control proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
revision of zoning plan grounds for revision procedural preliminary objections administrative complaint standing against building permit zoning exclusion

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 47 Abs. 2 VwGO
Revisionszulassung; Präklusion nach § 47 Abs. 2 VwGO bei nach Auslegung eintretenden Sachverhalten
§ 133 Abs. 1 VwGO
Cited to establish the admissibility of the complaint in conjunction with § 132 Abs. 1 VwGO.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Serves as the main ground for the verdict by justifying the grant of permission for the appeal on points of law due to the general significance of the legal issue.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Cited as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.
§ 132 Abs. 1 VwGO
Cited to establish the admissibility of the complaint challenging the non-acceptance of the appeal.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Cited as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Cited as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.
AI generated
4 CN 1/13
Preclusion of zoning plan review under § 47(2a) VwGO for failure to object during repeated public consultations.
4 CN 2/15
Normenkontrollantrag: Preclusion under § 47 Abs. 2a VwGO for objections attributed to a different legal entity
4 CN 3/10
Preclusion of objections in norm control under § 47 Abs. 2a VwGO for self-evident interests not raised during public consultation
4 BN 20/19, 4 BN 20/19 (4 CN 3/19)
Norm control admissibility of zoning plan objections filed before statutory repeal of § 47 Abs. 2a VwGO
4 CN 3/09
Inadmissibility of zoning plan challenge under § 47(2a) VwGO after supplementary public display during pending litigation

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Serves as the main ground for the verdict by justifying the grant of permission for the appeal on points of law due to the general significance of the legal issue.

§ 132 Abs. 1 VwGO

Cited to establish the admissibility of the complaint challenging the non-acceptance of the appeal.

§ 133 Abs. 1 VwGO

Cited to establish the admissibility of the complaint in conjunction with § 132 Abs. 1 VwGO.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Cited as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Cited as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Cited as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Präklusion nach § 47 Abs. 2 VwGO bei nach Auslegung eintretenden Sachverhalten

[GRUENDE]

Die gemäß § 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO zulässige Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann zur weiteren Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob und gegebenenfalls unter welchen weiteren Voraussetzungen ein Antragsteller, der während der öffentlichen Auslegung eines Bebauungsplans keine Einwendungen geltend gemacht hat, im Normenkontrollverfahren gegen einen Bebauungsplan nach § 47 Abs. 2a VwGO präkludiert ist, wenn er rechtliche Bedenken gegen den Plan geltend macht, die an Sachverhalte anknüpfen, die der Auslegung des Bebauungsplans zeitlich nachfolgen.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.