Infrastructure contribution consequences of step-by-step facility construction and provisional measures
Germany (DE)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant's complaint and permitted the defendant to file a revision appeal, finding that the legal questions involved possess fundamental significance for clarifying the contribution-levy consequences of the step-by-step construction of infrastructure facilities and associated provisional measures. The case concerns a dispute over infrastructure contributions, specifically challenging the assessment or treatment of costs arising from the phased implementation of development facilities rather than their completion in a single instance. The court's decision was based on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which permits an appeal on appeal where the matter is of fundamental legal importance, and it set the provisional value in dispute for the revision proceedings pursuant to §§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, 52 Abs. 3, and 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
Legislator headnote
AI generated§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Infrastructure contribution consequences of step-by-step facility construction and provisional measures: The case concerns a dispute over infrastructure contributions, specifically challenging the assessment or treatment of costs arising from the phased implementation of development facilities rather than their completion in a single instance. The court's decision was based on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which permits an appeal on appeal where the matter is of fundamental legal importance, and it set the provisional value in dispute for the revision proceedings pursuant to §§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, 52 Abs. 3, and 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedBasis for allowing the revision appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
Basis for the provisional determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Full text
Revisionszulassung; schrittweise Herstellung einer Erschließungsanlage; provisorische Maßnahmen
[GRUENDE]
Die Beschwerde der Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der erschließungsbeitragsrechtlichen Folgen einer schrittweisen Herstellung einer Erschließungsanlage einschließlich der damit einhergehenden Durchführung provisorischer Maßnahmen geben.
Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.