Contribution liability for staged infrastructure completion and provisional measures
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the defendant's complaint against the lower court's refusal, ordering that the appeal on points of law be admitted because the legal question possesses fundamental significance. The dispute concerned the calculation of infrastructure contributions (erschließungsbeiträge) in the context of a staged completion of an infrastructure facility, specifically addressing the legal consequences of implementing provisional measures during the process. The decision relied on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO as the decisive legal basis for admitting the revision due to the need to clarify the contributory status and cost allocation associated with stepwise construction and interim measures, thereby setting the stage for a substantive hearing on these unclarified principles.
Legislator headnote
AI generated§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG; Contribution liability for staged infrastructure completion and provisional measures: The dispute concerned the calculation of infrastructure contributions (erschließungsbeiträge) in the context of a staged completion of an infrastructure facility, specifically addressing the legal consequences of implementing provisional measures during the process. The decision relied on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO as the decisive legal basis for admitting the revision due to the need to clarify the contributory status and cost allocation associated with stepwise construction and interim measures, thereby setting the stage for a substantive hearing on these unclarified principles.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedBasis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding staged infrastructure completion.
Applied to determine the provisional value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Applied to determine the provisional value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Applied to determine the provisional value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Full text
Revisionszulassung; schrittweise Herstellung einer Erschließungsanlage; provisorische Maßnahmen
[GRUENDE]
Die Beschwerde der Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der erschließungsbeitragsrechtlichen Folgen einer schrittweisen Herstellung einer Erschließungsanlage einschließlich der damit einhergehenden Durchführung provisorischer Maßnahmen geben.
Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.