Infrastructure charges arising from step-by-step construction of public facilities and provisional measures
Germany (DE)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) dismissed the defendant's appeal and granted leave for the appeal on points of law (Revision) to the higher court, holding that the defendant's position on the admissibility of the appeal was justified and the appeal against the admissibility decision was well-founded. The dispute concerns the legal consequences of the step-by-step construction of public infrastructure facilities, specifically including the implementation of provisional measures, and their impact on the calculation of infrastructure charges (Erschließungsbeiträge). The court authorized the appeal under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO due to the fundamental importance of the case, allowing the Senate to clarify the relevant legal issues, while setting the provisional amount in dispute for the revision proceedings pursuant to §§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, 52 Abs. 3, and 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
Legislator headnote
AI generated§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Infrastructure charges arising from step-by-step construction of public facilities and provisional measures: The dispute concerns the legal consequences of the step-by-step construction of public infrastructure facilities, specifically including the implementation of provisional measures, and their impact on the calculation of infrastructure charges (Erschließungsbeiträge). The court authorized the appeal under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO due to the fundamental importance of the case, allowing the Senate to clarify the relevant legal issues, while setting the provisional amount in dispute for the revision proceedings pursuant to §§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, 52 Abs. 3, and 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedMain ground for the verdict, as the court explicitly grants leave for the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental importance of the case.
Procedural basis cited to determine the provisional amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Full text
Revisionszulassung; schrittweise Herstellung einer Erschließungsanlage; provisorische Maßnahmen
[GRUENDE]
Die Beschwerde der Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der erschließungsbeitragsrechtlichen Folgen einer schrittweisen Herstellung einer Erschließungsanlage einschließlich der damit einhergehenden Durchführung provisorischer Maßnahmen geben.
Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.