Subdivision charges triggered by step-by-step construction of access facilities and provisional measures
Germany (DE)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Federal Administrative Court allowed an appeal on points of law, granting the defendant (defendant-landowner) a successful challenge to the lower court's denial of such permission, thereby paving the way for a full review of the case by the senior senate. The dispute concerned whether a step-by-step construction of an access facility, involving the simultaneous implementation of provisional measures, could trigger immediate liability for subdivision charges. The court based its decision on the principle of "basic significance" under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, holding that the subdivision charge implications of phased infrastructure development and the legal status of interim measures remain unclear and require clarification by the appellate panel.
Legislator headnote
AI generated§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG; Subdivision charges triggered by step-by-step construction of access facilities and provisional measures: The dispute concerned whether a step-by-step construction of an access facility, involving the simultaneous implementation of provisional measures, could trigger immediate liability for subdivision charges. The court based its decision on the principle of "basic significance" under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, holding that the subdivision charge implications of phased infrastructure development and the legal status of interim measures remain unclear and require clarification by the appellate panel.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedGround for granting leave to file an appeal on points of law due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.
Procedural rule used in conjunction with § 47 GKG to determine the amount in dispute.
Procedural rule cited for the calculation of court fees based on the determined amount in dispute.
Full text
Revisionszulassung; schrittweise Herstellung einer Erschließungsanlage; provisorische Maßnahmen
[GRUENDE]
Die Beschwerde der Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der erschließungsbeitragsrechtlichen Folgen einer schrittweisen Herstellung einer Erschließungsanlage einschließlich der damit einhergehenden Durchführung provisorischer Maßnahmen geben.
Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.