Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
7 B 19/14, 7 B 19/14 (7 C 17/15) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:180615B7B19.14.0 AI generated

Compatibility of the Saarland exclusion of objections in administrative proceedings with EU law

Case Number 7 B 19/14, 7 B 19/14 (7 C 17/15)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the plaintiff's leave to appeal in revision, finding the admissible complaint justified on grounds of fundamental significance. The dispute concerns the compatibility of § 73(4) sentence 3 of the Saarland Administrative Procedure Act (SVwVfG), which excludes certain objections, with European Union law, a question necessitating clarification due to a pending infringement proceeding by the European Commission against the Federal Republic of Germany (CJEU Case C-137/14). The court ordered that the revision proceedings proceed, prioritizing the fundamental legal question over the specific merits of the individual case.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG; Compatibility of the Saarland exclusion of objections in administrative proceedings with EU law: The dispute concerns the compatibility of § 73(4) sentence 3 of the Saarland Administrative Procedure Act (SVwVfG), which excludes certain objections, with European Union law, a question necessitating clarification due to a pending infringement proceeding by the European Commission against the Federal Republic of Germany (CJEU Case C-137/14). The court ordered that the revision proceedings proceed, prioritizing the fundamental legal question over the specific merits of the individual case.

Keywords

AI generated
grounds for revision grounds for exclusion infringement procedure preliminary ruling procedure administrative complaint pending proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Serves as the main ground for admitting the revision based on the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the determination of the disputed value for the complaint procedure.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the determination of the disputed value for the revision procedure.
AI generated
7 B 4/14, 7 B 4/14 (7 C 1/15)
Compatibility of statutory exclusion of environmental objections with EU law
4 BN 40/15, 4 BN 40/15 (4 CN 3/16)
Compatibility of the one-year exclusion period for challenging violations of the inter-municipal consultation duty in German building law with Union law
1 B 70/17, 1 B 70/17, 1 PKH 41/17
Revisionszulassung in Asylsachen: Unzulässigkeit der Grundsatzrüge bei abweichender Tatsachenwürdigung ohne klärungsbedürftige Rechtsfrage
1 B 58/16, 1 B 58/16 (1 C 18/16)
Admissibility of Revision: Interpreting Interplay Between §§ 26a and 27a AsylG
7 B 26/09, 7 B 26/09 (7 C 1/10)
Temporal transition of Environmental Legal Remedies Act exclusion rules and compatibility with EU Community law

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Serves as the main ground for admitting the revision based on the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the determination of the disputed value for the complaint procedure.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the determination of the disputed value for the revision procedure.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Vereinbarkeit von § 73 Abs. 4 Satz 3 VwVfG SL mit Europarecht

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige Beschwerde der Klägerin ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Die Rechtssache wirft jedenfalls die angesichts des von der Europäischen Kommission gegen die Bundesrepublik Deutschland eingeleiteten Vertragsverletzungsverfahrens (EuGH Rs. C-137/14) erneut klärungsbedürftige Frage auf, ob die Bestimmungen über den Ausschluss der Einwendungen in § 73 Abs. 4 Satz 3 SVwVfG mit dem Recht der Europäischen Union vereinbar sind.

Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.