Legislator Case Law & Legislation
7 B 20/14, 7 B 20/14 (7 C 2/15) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:280115B7B20.14.0 AI generated

Admissibility of revision on the exclusion grounds and scope of application of the Freedom of Information Act (IFG)

Case Number 7 B 20/14, 7 B 20/14 (7 C 2/15)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant's complaint, overturning the lower court's refusal to admit an appeal (Revision), thereby allowing the case to proceed to the appellate level. The dispute concerned a lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act (IFG), specifically challenging the applicability of exclusion grounds and the scope of the law's informational duties. The Court determined that the case possessed fundamental legal significance pursuant to § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO because it would provide an opportunity to clarify the prerequisites for the exclusion grounds under §§ 5 and 6 IFG and the scope of application of § 7 Abs. 2 Satz 1 IFG.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 3 GKG; Admissibility of revision on the exclusion grounds and scope of application of the Freedom of Information Act (IFG): The dispute concerned a lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act (IFG), specifically challenging the applicability of exclusion grounds and the scope of the law's informational duties. The Court determined that the case possessed fundamental legal significance pursuant to § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO because it would provide an opportunity to clarify the prerequisites for the exclusion grounds under §§ 5 and 6 IFG and the scope of application of § 7 Abs. 2 Satz 1 IFG.

Keywords

AI generated
freedom of information grounds for revision procedural rules grounds for exclusion administrative complaint rule of law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for granting the complaint as the case has fundamental legal significance.
§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG
Procedural rule applied for the determination of the amount in dispute in both the complaint and revision proceedings.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute in the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 3 GKG
Procedural rule applied for the determination of the amount in dispute in the complaint proceedings.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for granting the complaint as the case has fundamental legal significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute in the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 3 GKG

Procedural rule applied for the determination of the amount in dispute in the complaint proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG

Procedural rule applied for the determination of the amount in dispute in both the complaint and revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Ausschlussgründe und Anwendungsbereich des IFG

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Beklagten gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem angefochtenen Urteil ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne des § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Das Revisionsverfahren kann dem Senat voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben, sich zu den Voraussetzungen der Ausschlussgründe nach den §§ 5, 6 IFG und zum Anwendungsbereich des § 7 Abs. 2 Satz 1 IFG zu verhalten.

Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.