Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
7 B 4/14, 7 B 4/14 (7 C 1/15) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:050115B7B4.14.0 AI generated

Compatibility of statutory exclusion of environmental objections with EU law

Case Number 7 B 4/14, 7 B 4/14 (7 C 1/15)
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Administrative Court dismissed the defendant’s opposition and granted leave to appeal the lower court’s judgment, allowing the plaintiff to pursue the revision. The case concerned a dispute under environmental law where the plaintiff challenged the finality of the administrative act based on a procedural defect. The court held that the case had fundamental significance because it required clarification on whether the statutory exclusion of objections in German environmental law is compatible with European Union law. The decision is grounded in § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO (federal administrative procedure code) and addresses the compatibility of § 10 Abs. 3 Satz 5 BImSchG (Federal Immission Control Act) and § 2 Abs. 3 UmwRG (Environmental Remediation Act) with EU law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG; Compatibility of statutory exclusion of environmental objections with EU law: The case concerned a dispute under environmental law where the plaintiff challenged the finality of the administrative act based on a procedural defect. The court held that the case had fundamental significance because it required clarification on whether the statutory exclusion of objections in German environmental law is compatible with European Union law. The decision is grounded in § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO (federal administrative procedure code) and addresses the compatibility of § 10 Abs. 3 Satz 5 BImSchG (Federal Immission Control Act) and § 2 Abs. 3 UmwRG (Environmental Remediation Act) with EU law.

Keywords

AI generated
statutory ground for exclusion procedural objections grounds for revision environmental standard procedural act action by staff

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Basis for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Provisions determining the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Provisions determining the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
AI generated
7 B 19/14, 7 B 19/14 (7 C 17/15)
Compatibility of the Saarland exclusion of objections in administrative proceedings with EU law
7 B 26/09, 7 B 26/09 (7 C 1/10)
Temporal transition of Environmental Legal Remedies Act exclusion rules and compatibility with EU Community law
7 C 1/15
Preclusion of public association objections in environmental permitting is incompatible with EU directives; standing excludes post-permit conditions and start-up extensions
4 BN 40/15, 4 BN 40/15 (4 CN 3/16)
Compatibility of the one-year exclusion period for challenging violations of the inter-municipal consultation duty in German building law with Union law
4 CN 3/16
Conflict between EU EIA Directive access to justice and German land-use plan statutory notice defect waiver periods

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Basis for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Provisions determining the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Provisions determining the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revisionszulassung; Einwendungsausschluss

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem angefochtenen Urteil ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne des § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. Sie wirft die erneut klärungsbedürftige Frage auf, ob die Bestimmungen über den Ausschluss von Einwendungen in § 10 Abs. 3 Satz 5 BImSchG und § 2 Abs. 3 UmwRG mit dem Recht der Europäischen Union vereinbar sind.

Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.