Legislator Case Law & Legislation
26 W (pat) 9/10 AI generated

Trademark appeal: Wiedereinsetzung for missed fee payment due to attorney fault under § 91 MarkenG and § 85 ZPO

Case Number 26 W (pat) 9/10
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Patent Court's 26th Senate granted the applicant's petition for reinstatement into the previous legal standing, effectively waiving the deadline for paying the appeal fee and allowing the trademark complaint to proceed. The dispute arose from a trademark complaint procedure concerning a word/figurative mark application, where the applicant failed to timely deposit the appeal fee due to a procedural failure. The court determined that the applicant had plausibly demonstrated, without fault attributable to herself or her legal representative, that she was prevented from making the payment in time, thereby satisfying the requirements for equitable relief. The decision was grounded in the German Trademark Act (§ 91 Abs. 1 Satz 1 MarkenG) regarding reinstatement and applied the standard of personal fault from the Code of Civil Procedure (§ 85 Abs. 2 ZPO) to attribute responsibility to the procedural representative.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 85 Abs. 2 ZPO, § 91 Abs. 1 Satz 1 MarkenG; Trademark appeal: Wiedereinsetzung for missed fee payment due to attorney fault under § 91 MarkenG and § 85 ZPO: The dispute arose from a trademark complaint procedure concerning a word/figurative mark application, where the applicant failed to timely deposit the appeal fee due to a procedural failure. The court determined that the applicant had plausibly demonstrated, without fault attributable to herself or her legal representative, that she was prevented from making the payment in time, thereby satisfying the requirements for equitable relief. The decision was grounded in the German Trademark Act (§ 91 Abs. 1 Satz 1 MarkenG) regarding reinstatement and applied the standard of personal fault from the Code of Civil Procedure (§ 85 Abs. 2 ZPO) to attribute responsibility to the procedural representative.

Keywords

AI generated
patent attorney payment of fee figurative trademarks standing to appeal Civil Procedure Code missed deadline

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 91 Abs. 1 Satz 1 MarkenG

Primary legal basis for granting the applicant reinstatement into the previous legal standing for the missed deadline to pay the appeal fee.

§ 85 Abs. 2 ZPO

Procedural standard applied to determine that the applicant was not at fault for the missed deadline due to the conduct of the legal representative.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Markenbeschwerdeverfahren – "sparhandy (Wort-Bild-Marke)" – Wiedereinsetzung in die Frist zur Einzahlung der Beschwerdegebühr

[TENOR]

In der Beschwerdesache

betreffend die Markenanmeldung 307 31 772.2

hat der 26. Senat (Marken-Beschwerdesenat) des Bundespatentgerichts in der Sitzung vom 3. März 2010 durch den Vorsitzenden Richter Dr. Fuchs-Wissemann, den Richter Reker und den Richter Lehner

beschlossen:

Der Anmelderin wird auf ihren Antrag Wiedereinsetzung in die Frist zur Einzahlung der Beschwerdegebühr gewährt.

[GRUENDE]

Die Anmelderin hat glaubhaft gemacht, ohne eigenes oder ihr zuzurechnendes Verschulden ihrer Verfahrensbevollmächtigten (§ 85 Abs. 2 ZPO) an der rechtzeitigen Einzahlung der Beschwerdegebühr verhindert gewesen zu sein.

Ihr war daher antragsgemäß Wiedereinsetzung in den vorigen Stand zu gewähren (§ 91 Abs. 1 Satz 1 MarkenG).