Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
2 BvE 4/26 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2026:es20260709.2bve000426 AI generated

German statutory health insurance contribution rate legislation: Unsuccessful interim relief in constitutional inter-institutional dispute over legislative procedure

Case Number 2 BvE 4/26
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the applications for interim injunctive relief in a dispute between federal legislative bodies. The case concerned challenges to the legislative procedure for the Statutory Health Insurance Contribution Rate Stabilization Act, specifically regarding procedural matters in the enactment of this healthcare financing legislation. Relying on §§ 32(5) and 91(1) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, the Court rejected the urgent requests for interim measures, indicating that the applicants did not demonstrate the necessary urgency or likelihood of success to warrant immediate judicial intervention, with the full reasoned judgment to be delivered separately under § 32(5) Sentence 2 BVerfGG.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 32 Absatz 5 Satz 1 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz, § 32 Absatz 5 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz; German statutory health insurance contribution rate legislation: Unsuccessful interim relief in constitutional inter-institutional dispute over legislative procedure: The case concerned challenges to the legislative procedure for the Statutory Health Insurance Contribution Rate Stabilization Act, specifically regarding procedural matters in the enactment of this healthcare financing legislation. Relying on §§ 32(5) and 91(1) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, the Court rejected the urgent requests for interim measures, indicating that the applicants did not demonstrate the necessary urgency or likelihood of success to warrant immediate judicial intervention, with the full reasoned judgment to be delivered separately under § 32(5) Sentence 2 BVerfGG.

Keywords

AI generated
interim relief health insurance financing matter in dispute health legislation health insurance legislative act

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 32 Absatz 5 Satz 1 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz
Procedural basis for the preliminary notice of the decision regarding the denial of interim injunctive relief.
§ 32 Absatz 5 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz
Procedural basis for the separate delivery of the full reasoned judgment to the parties.
AI generated
2 BvQ 47/26
Interim relief against GKV contribution rate stabilization legislation: rejection of urgent constitutional complaint
B 12 R 57/18 B
Admissibility of complaint for failure to formulate specific constitutional challenge to statutory pension health insurance surcharge
1 BvR 2599/21
Standing of corporate sponsor to challenge health insurance reserve transfer statute under German constitutional law
2 BvQ 59/19
Interim injunction against enactment of statutes: quorum defect in parliamentary vote and the admissibility of preventive constitutional review
2 BvE 4/25
Provisional relief denied in constitutional challenge to parliamentary amendment procedure; balancing of irreversible legislative blockage against procedural participation rights

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 32 Absatz 5 Satz 1 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz

Procedural basis for the preliminary notice of the decision regarding the denial of interim injunctive relief.

§ 32 Absatz 5 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz

Procedural basis for the separate delivery of the full reasoned judgment to the parties.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Erfolglose Eilanträge im Organstreitverfahren bzgl der Gestaltung des Gesetzgebungsverfahrens zum GKV-Beitragssatzstabilisierungsgesetz - Vorabmitteilung gem § 32 Abs 5 S 1 BVerfGG, Begründung wird nachgereicht

[TENOR]

1. Die Anträge auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung werden abgelehnt.

2. Die Begründung der Entscheidung wird den Beteiligten gemäß § 32 Absatz 5 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz gesondert übermittelt.