Legislator Case Law & Legislation
1 BvR 2284/23, 1 BvR 2285/23 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2026:rs20260410.1bvr228423 AI generated

Determination of the subject matter value for attorney fees in a constitutional complaint based on the procedure's subjective and objective significance

Case Number 1 BvR 2284/23, 1 BvR 2285/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Constitutional Court (First Senate) determined the value of the subject matter of the attorney's activity at €250,000, a valuation driven by the high subjective and objective significance of the proceedings. This procedural decision addresses the fee calculation context for a constitutional complaint procedure, rather than a substantive ruling on the merits of an underlying dispute. The legal basis for the determination relies on the inherent weight and complexity of the constitutional proceedings, justifying the high valuation for the purposes of professional fee assessment in this specific jurisdictional context.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Determination of the subject matter value for attorney fees in a constitutional complaint based on the procedure's subjective and objective significance: Der Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit wird unter Berücksichtigung der hohen subjektiven und objektiven Bedeutung des Verfahrens auf 250.000 Euro (in Worten: zweihundertfünfzigtausend Euro) festgesetzt.

Keywords

AI generated
determination of attorney fees valuation proceedings matter in dispute complexity of proceedings cost calculation inadequate constitutional complaint
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren

[TENOR]

Der Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit wird unter Berücksichtigung der hohen subjektiven und objektiven Bedeutung des Verfahrens auf 250.000 Euro (in Worten: zweihundertfünfzigtausend Euro) festgesetzt.