Legislator Case Law & Legislation
2 BvL 10/22 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2026:ls20260326.2bvl001022 AI generated

Effect of withdrawal of referring court's application on abstract norm control proceedings

Case Number 2 BvL 10/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the proceedings, effectively allowing the applicant (the referring court) to prevail through the termination of the action following the withdrawal of its application. The case involved a constitutional complaint or abstract norm control challenge (2 BvL 10/22) concerning a statutory provision, which the referring court initiated and subsequently rescinded via a separate decision on February 20, 2026. The decisive legal basis for the order was the procedural doctrine that a constitutional proceeding is mandatorily dismissed (Einstellung) when the initiating application is formally withdrawn by the applicant, rendering a substantive judgment on the validity of the norm unnecessary.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Effect of withdrawal of referring court's application on abstract norm control proceedings: Das vorlegende Gericht hat seinen Antrag, durch den das Verfahren eingeleitet wurde, mit Beschluss vom 20. Februar 2026 - 26 K 258/15 - zurückgenommen. Das Verfahren ist daher einzustellen (vgl. BVerfG, Beschluss des Zweiten Senats vom 27. September 2024 - 2 BvL 13/23 -).

Keywords

AI generated
termination of proceedings effects of the judgment legal doctrine statutory basis withdrawal of opposition administrative revocation of decision

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Einstellung eines Normenkontrollverfahrens nach Antragsrücknahme - Parallelentscheidung

[TENOR]

Das Verfahren wird eingestellt.

[GRUENDE]

Das vorlegende Gericht hat seinen Antrag, durch den das Verfahren eingeleitet wurde, mit Beschluss vom 20. Februar 2026 - 26 K 258/15 - zurückgenommen. Das Verfahren ist daher einzustellen (vgl. BVerfG, Beschluss des Zweiten Senats vom 27. September 2024 - 2 BvL 13/23 -).