Legislator Case Law & Legislation
2 BvR 1615/12 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2015:rk20150216.2bvr161512 AI generated

Exclusive entitlement to child benefit under § 64(1) EStG and allocation between eligible parents

Case Number 2 BvR 1615/12
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Germany (DE)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint without substantive reasoning, resulting in a non-acceptance decision (Nichtannahmebeschluss) where the complainant did not prevail and the lower court’s ruling remains in force. The dispute concerned the taxation of family benefits, specifically the statutory provision that child benefit (Kindergeld) be paid to only one of the two eligible parents under § 64(1) of the German Income Tax Act (EStG), challenging the allocation mechanism for this specific social benefit. The decisive legal basis involved the constitutional review of the income tax regulation governing the exclusive entitlement of a single parent to receive child benefit, with the Chamber finding no indication of a violation of fundamental rights sufficient to justify acceptance for hearing.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 64 Abs 1 EStG; Exclusive entitlement to child benefit under § 64(1) EStG and allocation between eligible parents: The dispute concerned the taxation of family benefits, specifically the statutory provision that child benefit (Kindergeld) be paid to only one of the two eligible parents under § 64(1) of the German Income Tax Act (EStG), challenging the allocation mechanism for this specific social benefit. The decisive legal basis involved the constitutional review of the income tax regulation governing the exclusive entitlement of a single parent to receive child benefit, with the Chamber finding no indication of a violation of fundamental rights sufficient to justify acceptance for hearing.

Keywords

AI generated
entitlement to benefits family benefit single-parent family income tax statutory right hearing of a parent

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Kindergeldzahlung an nur einen Berechtigten (§ 64 Abs 1 EStG)