Constitutional complaint against revocation of driver's license for concurrent alcohol and cannabis consumption

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint as inadmissible without a reasoned decision, leaving the lower court's revocation of the complainant's driver's license in force. The dispute concerned a driver's license revocation ordered by a lower court following an incident involving mixed consumption of alcohol and cannabis, which the complainant challenged as a violation of their fundamental rights. The decision rests on the procedural doctrine that constitutional complaints regarding traffic license revocations are typically inadmissible unless they disclose specific defects in the constitutional review process of the previous instances, failing to meet the substantive admissibility requirements under German constitutional law.