Valuation of subject matter value for attorney fees in constitutional complaint and provisional injunction proceedings; refusal of out-of-pocket expense reimbursement
Germany (DE)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Federal Constitutional Court fixed the subject matter value for the attorney’s representation at €1,000,000 in the main proceedings and €100,000 in the preliminary injunction proceedings, while dismissing the applicant’s request for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses in the interim measure procedure. This decision addresses administrative determinations in a constitutional complaint and the associated preliminary injunction procedure, specifically concerning the valuation of legal services and the recovery of litigation costs. The ruling relies on §§ 37(2) sentence 2 and 22(1) of the Federal Lawyers’ Fee Act (RVG), which govern the calculation of subject matter values and the conditions for cost reimbursement in constitutional court proceedings.
Legislator headnote
AI generated§ 22 Abs. 1 RVG, § 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 RVG; Valuation of subject matter value for attorney fees in constitutional complaint and provisional injunction proceedings; refusal of out-of-pocket expense reimbursement: This decision addresses administrative determinations in a constitutional complaint and the associated preliminary injunction procedure, specifically concerning the valuation of legal services and the recovery of litigation costs. The ruling relies on §§ 37(2) sentence 2 and 22(1) of the Federal Lawyers’ Fee Act (RVG), which govern the calculation of subject matter values and the conditions for cost reimbursement in constitutional court proceedings.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedProvision cited to justify the determination of the subject matter value for the attorney's activities in the main and provisional proceedings.
Provision cited alongside § 37 to govern the calculation and fixing of the fee-relevant subject matter value.
Full text
Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren sowie im eA-Verfahren - Ablehnung der Auslagenerstattung im eA-Verfahren
[TENOR]
1. Der Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit des Bevollmächtigten zu 1. im Hauptsacheverfahren wird auf 1.000.000
€ (in Worten: eine Million Euro) und im Verfahren auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung auf 100.000 € (in Worten: einhunderttausend
Euro) festgesetzt (§ 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2, § 22 Abs. 1 RVG).
2. Der Antrag auf Erstattung der Auslagen in dem Verfahren auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt.