Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VR.2010.00003 • VG ZH VR.2010.00003 AI generated

Appeal Dismissed Over Land Expropriation Compensation and Traffic Noise

Case Number VR.2010.00003
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Zurich (CH-ZH)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The administrative court dismissed an appeal regarding compensation for land expropriation and traffic noise after the appellant failed to submit a supplementary statement of appeal, thus deciding based on the existing case file. The court upheld the valuation commission's decision to award only 227 Fr./m2 for expropriated land, despite assessing the full building land value at 682 Fr./m2, because the expropriation involved only a narrow, inferior 1.5-meter strip within the building line, justifying a two-thirds reduction from the full land value as it represented only a small portion of the total property and would fetch little market price. Furthermore, the court agreed that no compensation was warranted for the formal expropriation of neighbor rights due to a planned expanded bus line because noise measurements confirmed that immission limit values would not be exceeded at the property.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 26 Abs. II BV, § 46 Abs. II AbtrG, § 46 AbtrG, § 13 Abs. I AbtrG; Appeal Dismissed Over Land Expropriation Compensation and Traffic Noise: The court upheld the valuation commission's decision to award only 227 Fr./m2 for expropriated land, despite assessing the full building land value at 682 Fr./m2, because the expropriation involved only a narrow, inferior 1.5-meter strip within the building line, justifying a two-thirds reduction from the full land value as it represented only a small portion of the total property and would fetch little market price. Furthermore, the court agreed that no compensation was warranted for the formal expropriation of neighbor rights due to a planned expanded bus line because noise measurements confirmed that immission limit values would not be exceeded at the property.

Keywords

AI generated
expropriated land market value of property right to property noise exposure cadastre right to price reduction removal of attached property

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 26 Abs. II BV
This provision is cited in the list of legal norms associated with the final decision, indicating its substantive application.
§ 46 Abs. II AbtrG
This provision is cited in the list of legal norms associated with the final decision, indicating its substantive application.
§ 46 AbtrG
This provision is cited in the list of legal norms associated with the final decision, indicating its substantive application.
§ 13 Abs. I AbtrG
This provision is cited in the list of legal norms associated with the final decision, indicating its substantive application.
AI generated
VR.2016.00002
Property Owner Expropriation Compensation Appeal Dismissed Due to Non-Excessive Construction Vibration
VB.2016.00540
Property Owner Noise Barrier Appeal Dismissed
VB.2017.00372
Road Project Approval Upheld Despite Objections to Expropriation and Noise Pollution
VR.2013.00001
Expropriation Scope and Compensation Dispute

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 26 Abs. II BV

This provision is cited in the list of legal norms associated with the final decision, indicating its substantive application.

§ 46 Abs. II AbtrG

This provision is cited in the list of legal norms associated with the final decision, indicating its substantive application.

§ 46 AbtrG

This provision is cited in the list of legal norms associated with the final decision, indicating its substantive application.

§ 13 Abs. I AbtrG

This provision is cited in the list of legal norms associated with the final decision, indicating its substantive application.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VR.2010.00003

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=210241&W10_KEY=13317115&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VR.2010.00003 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 25.11.2010 · Spruchkörper: · 3. Abteilung/3. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Enteignungsrecht · Betreff: · Landabtretung · Entschädigung für Landabtretung und wegen Verkehrslärm. Das Verwaltungsgericht entscheidet androhungsgemäss aufgrund der Akten, nachdem der Rekurrent innert Frist keine ergänzende Rekursbegründung eingereicht hat (E. 1.2). Dass die Schätzungskommission den Baulandwert auf 682 Fr./m2 schätzte und die Abtretungsentschädigung auf 227 Fr./m2 festsetzte, ist nicht zu beanstanden:

Die Enteignung betrifft lediglich einen 1,5 Meter breiten, minderwertigen Landstreifen im Baulinienbereich, der auf dem Markt kaum einen Preis erzielen könnte und der nur einen geringen Teil des Gesamtgrundstücks des Rekurrenten ausmacht; dies rechtfertigt einen Einschlag auf den Baulandwert um zwei Drittel (E. 2). Ebenfalls zu Recht verneinte die Schätzungskommission einen Entschädigungsanspruch wegen formeller Enteignung von Nachbarrechten aufgrund der geplanten Durchfahrt einer erweiterten Buslinie, da die Immissionsgrenzwerte im Bereich der Liegenschaft des Rekurrenten gemäss einem Lärmgutachten nicht überschritten werden (E. 3).

Rekursabweisung (E. 4). · --- · Stichworte: · ABTRETUNG BAULANDPREISE BUSLINIEN EINSCHLAG ENTEIGNUNG ENTSCHÄDIGUNG FORMELLE ENTEIGNUNG FRIST/-EN IMMISSIONSGRENZWERT LANDABTRETUNG LÄRM MINDERWERT STREITWERT VERKEHRSIMMISSION VERKEHRSWERT VORGARTENLAND · Rechtsnormen: · § 13 Abs. I AbtrG § 46 AbtrG § 46 Abs. II AbtrG Art. 26 Abs. II BV · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 4