Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VK.2000.00007 • VG ZH VK.2000.00007 AI generated

Municipality v. Private Company: Leachate Disposal Contract Interpretation

Case Number VK.2000.00007
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Zurich (CH-ZH)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court reviewed a dispute concerning the interpretation of a public-law contract between a municipality and a private company regarding the disposal of leachate from a sewage sludge landfill. The court determined it would only rule on claims directly related to the contract's content and found that the contract's wording did not permit immediate termination of the mandate-like relationship, but it established a final date upon which the contract would lapse if the necessary condition for its termination did not occur, upholding the principle of legitimate expectation in the contractual relationship.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 156 OR, Art. 404 lit. I OR, Art. 2 ZGB, § 82 lit. k VRG; Municipality v. Private Company: Leachate Disposal Contract Interpretation: The court determined it would only rule on claims directly related to the contract's content and found that the contract's wording did not permit immediate termination of the mandate-like relationship, but it established a final date upon which the contract would lapse if the necessary condition for its termination did not occur, upholding the principle of legitimate expectation in the contractual relationship.

Keywords

AI generated
contract interpretation landfill permit interpretation of the law public procurement contract sewage sludge municipal obligation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 156 OR
This provision was used as the primary legal basis concerning the interpretation of the public-law contract in the context of the final orders.
Art. 404 lit. I OR
This provision was cited in relation to the conditions for the termination of the contract, which was addressed in the final orders.
Art. 2 ZGB
This provision was used to determine the moment the contractual relationship should cease, as ordered at the end of the decision.
§ 82 lit. k VRG
This procedural provision was cited concerning the extent to which the court could rule on the claim, as indicated in the dispositive.
AI generated
VK.2006.00003
Waste Removal Contract Termination Dispute
VK.2006.00007
Waste Collection Contract Termination and Unreasonableness
VB.2019.00568
Dispute over Municipal Waste Disposal Regulations

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 156 OR

This provision was used as the primary legal basis concerning the interpretation of the public-law contract in the context of the final orders.

Art. 404 lit. I OR

This provision was cited in relation to the conditions for the termination of the contract, which was addressed in the final orders.

Art. 2 ZGB

This provision was used to determine the moment the contractual relationship should cease, as ordered at the end of the decision.

§ 82 lit. k VRG

This procedural provision was cited concerning the extent to which the court could rule on the claim, as indicated in the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VK.2000.00007

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

Druckansicht

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VK.2000.00007 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 19.06.2001 · Spruchkörper: · 4. Abteilung/4. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Übriges Verwaltungsrecht · Betreff: · Streitigkeit aus öffentlich-rechtlichem Vertrag · Auslegung eines verwaltungsrechtlichen Vertrags zwischen Gemeinwesen und Privatunternehmen über die Entsorgung des Sickerwassers einer Klärschlammdeponie. Eintreten auf die Klage nur, soweit das Begehren mit dem Vertragsinhalt zusammenhängt (E. 1).

Die Auslegung des Vertrags erlaubt keine sofortige Auflösung des auftragsähnlichen Vertragsverhältnisses, doch ist ein Zeitpunkt festzusetzen, zu dem der Vertrag im Fall des fehlenden Eintritts der für die Vertragsauflösung erforderlichen Bedingung spätestens dahinfällt (E. 2). · --- · Stichworte: · ABWASSER BODENSCHUTZ DEPONIE ENTSORGUNG GEWÄSSERSCHUTZ KLÄRSCHLAMM ÖFFENTLICH-RECHTLICHER VERTRAG VERFAHREN VERTRAGSAUFLÖSUNG VERTRAGSAUSLEGUNG VERTRAUENSPRINZIP VERWALTUNGSRECHTLICHER VERTRAG · Rechtsnormen: · Art. 156 OR Art. 404 lit. I OR § 82 lit. k VRG Art. 2 ZGB · Publikationen:

· - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 3