Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
JAAC 60.128 AI generated

European Commission Declares Suspension of Occupational Allowance Inadmissible in Family Reasons Case

Case Number JAAC 60.128
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Administrative Practice of Federal Authorities (VPB) (CH)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The European Commission of Human Rights declared inadmissible a request concerning the suspension of an occupational change allowance. The applicant argued that this suspension, for a period when she voluntarily ceased working for family reasons, violated her right to found a family under Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The Commission confirmed its established jurisprudence that Article 12 does not create an obligation for contracting states to financially support a parent who voluntarily stops working for familial reasons, finding the claim incompatible with the Convention's provisions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 12 CEDH, Art. 12 EMRK, Art. 12 CEDU, Art. 27 § 2; European Commission Declares Suspension of Occupational Allowance Inadmissible in Family Reasons Case: The applicant argued that this suspension, for a period when she voluntarily ceased working for family reasons, violated her right to found a family under Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The Commission confirmed its established jurisprudence that Article 12 does not create an obligation for contracting states to financially support a parent who voluntarily stops working for familial reasons, finding the claim incompatible with the Convention's provisions.

Keywords

AI generated
family allowance suspension period right to found a family right to work european Convention on Human Rights incapacity for work

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 12 CEDH
Cited as the provision allegedly violated by the Swiss courts' decisions, but found not to impose an obligation on contracting parties to financially support a parent who voluntarily ceases lucrative activity for family reasons.
Art. 12 EMRK
Malattia professionale. Revoca del versamento d’indennità per cambiamento d’occupazione, dopo che l’assicurato aveva manifestato l’intenzione di lasciare il lavoro per un periodo determinato. Art. 12 CEDU. Diritto di fondare una famiglia.
Art. 12 CEDU
Malattia professionale. Revoca del versamento d’indennità per cambiamento d’occupazione, dopo che l’assicurato aveva manifestato l’intenzione di lasciare il lavoro per un periodo determinato. Art. 12 CEDU. Diritto di fondare una famiglia.
Art. 27 § 2
Used to reject the application as being incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of the Convention.
AI generated
JAAC 58.126
European Commission of Human Rights v. Private Individuals
JAAC 53.63
Applicant's divorce claims inadmissible under European Convention on Human Rights

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 27 § 2

Used to reject the application as being incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of the Convention.

Art. 12 CEDH

Cited as the provision allegedly violated by the Swiss courts' decisions, but found not to impose an obligation on contracting parties to financially support a parent who voluntarily ceases lucrative activity for family reasons.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

JAAC 60.128

Déc. de la Comm. eur. DH du 11 avril 1996, déclarant irrecevable la req. N° 25928/94, Rita Cannatella c / Suisse

Maladie professionnelle. Suspension d’une allocation d’indemnité pour changement d’occupation, l’assurée ayant manifesté sa volonté de ne plus travailler pendant une période déterminée. Art. 12 CEDH. Droit de fonder une famille. Cette disposition n’impose pas aux Parties contractantes l’obligation de soutenir financièrement celui des parents qui cesse volontairement son activité lucrative pour des motifs familiaux (confirmation de la jurisprudence).

Berufskrankheit. Aufhebung einer Übergangsentschädigung, nachdem die Versicherte erklärt hatte, während eines bestimmten Zeitraums nicht mehr arbeiten zu wollen. Art. 12 EMRK. Recht, eine Familie zu gründen. Diese Bestimmung verpflichtet die Mitgliedstaaten nicht dazu, denjenigen Elternteil, welcher aus familiären Gründen freiwillig seine Berufstätigkeit aufgibt, finanziell zu unterstützen (Bestätigung der Rechtsprechung).

Malattia professionale. Revoca del versamento d’indennità per cambiamento d’occupazione, dopo che l’assicurato aveva manifestato l’intenzione di lasciare il lavoro per un periodo determinato. Art. 12 CEDU. Diritto di fondare una famiglia.

Questa disposizione non impone agli Stati Parte della Convenzione di sostenere finanziariamente il genitore che per motivi familiari rinuncia volontariamente all’attività professionale (conferma della giurisprudenza).

1. La requérante se plaint de ce que les décisions des tribunaux suisses de ne pas lui octroyer une indemnité pour changement d’occupation professionnelle pour la période qui se situe entre le ler août 1991 et le 29 février 1992 ont porté atteinte à son droit de fonder une famille. Elle invoque l’art. 12 CEDH, qui dispose: «A partir de 1’âge nubile, 1’homme et la femme ont le droit de se marier et de fonder une famille selon les lois nationales régissant l’exercice de ce droit.» La Commission rappelle que la convention ne garantit pas en tant que tel le droit à une assistance de l’Etat pour maintenir un certain niveau de vie. En particulier, l’art. 12 n’impose pas aux Parties contractantes l’obligation de soutenir financièrement celui des parents qui cesse volontairement son activité lucrative pour des motifs familiaux (cf. mutatis mutandis déc. du

4 mars 1986 sur la req. N° 11776/85, DR 46, p. 251). Il s’ensuit que cette partie de la requête est incompatible ratione materiae avec les dispositions de la convention et doit être rejetée, en application de l’art. 27 § 2.

Schweizerisches Bundesarchiv, Digitale Amtsdruckschriften Archives fédérales suisses, Publications officielles numérisées Archivio federale svizzero, Pubblicazioni ufficiali digitali

JAAC 60.128 - Déc. de la Comm. eur. DH du 11 avril 1996, déclarant irrecevable la req. N° 25928/94, Rita Cannatella c / Suisse

In Verwaltungspraxis der Bundesbehörden Dans Jurisprudence des autorités administratives de la Confédération In Giurisprudenza delle autorità amministrative della Confederazione

Jahr 1996 Année Anno

Band 60 Volume Volume

Seite --- Page Pagina

Ref. No 150 002 942

Das Dokument wurde durch das Schweizerische Bundesarchiv und die Bundeskanzlei konvertiert. Le document a été digitalisé par les Archives Fédérales Suisses et la Chancellerie fédérale. Il documento è stato convertito dall'Archivio federale svizzero e della Cancelleria federale.