Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VPB 5618-2002-2011 AI generated

Trademark Opposition Rejected

Case Number VPB 5618-2002-2011
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Administrative Practice of Federal Authorities (VPB) (CH)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

An opposition was filed against the registration of a trademark. The opposing party was represented by a law firm. The defendant was excluded from the proceedings. The opposition was rejected, and the trademark was to be definitively accepted for protection. The opposition fee was retained, and no costs were awarded. The decision was to be notified to the parties, with notification to the defendant made by publication.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 36 BüG, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Trademark Opposition Rejected: The opposing party was represented by a law firm. The defendant was excluded from the proceedings. The opposition was rejected, and the trademark was to be definitively accepted for protection. The opposition fee was retained, and no costs were awarded. The decision was to be notified to the parties, with notification to the defendant made by publication.

Keywords

AI generated
trademark opposition notification of the decision opposition proceedings well-known trademark registered trade mark objection to marriage

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 36 BüG
This provision is implicitly used as the basis for the decision to reject the opposition and accept the trademark for protection, as the case is an opposition procedure under the Swiss Trademarks Act.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is cited as the basis for the decision that the opposition fee remains with the Institute.
AI generated
VPB 9210-2006-3314
International Trademark Opposition Rejected
VPB 4574-2000-2061
Trademark Opposition and Refusal Due to Likelihood of Confusion
VPB 2000.728
Opposition Rejected Due to Non-Participation
VPB 5168-2002-1768
Trademark Opposition Rejected After Defendant's Exclusion
VPB 2005.812
Trademark Opposition Denied Due to Insufficient Grounds

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 36 BüG

This provision is implicitly used as the basis for the decision to reject the opposition and accept the trademark for protection, as the case is an opposition procedure under the Swiss Trademarks Act.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is cited as the basis for the decision that the opposition fee remains with the Institute.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Décision dans la procédure d’opposition no 5081/01

Opposant/e Sara Lee Meats Europe B. V., 39, Wegalaan, NL-2130 KC Hoofdorp, Hollande, marque internationale no 718871 LOVABLE MIMESIS, représentée par Jacobacci & Perani SA, 2, avenue de la Gare des Eaux-Vives, 1207 Genève, contre Défendeurs Röttger Wilhelm, Lenz Maximilian, Lenz Fabrian, Jankuhn Klaus, Giesebrechtstrasse 16, DE-10629 Berlin, marque internationale no 750511 Lovenation. Le 13 septembre 2002, l’Institut Fédéral de la Propriété Intellectuelle a décidé ce qui suit:

1. La défenderesse est exclue de la procédure.

2. L’opposition no 5081/2001 contre la marque internationale no 750511 Lovenation est rejetée.

3. La marque internationale no 750511 Lovenation sera définitivement acceptée à la protection en Suisse une fois la présente décision entrée en force.

4. La taxe d’opposition de 800 francs reste acquise à l’Institut.

5. Il n’est pas allouer de dépens.

6. La présente décision est notifiée aux parties; à la partie défenderesse par publication dans la Feuille fédérale.

Voies de droit: La présente décision peut être attaquée par voie de recours dans les 30 jours à dater de sa notification devant la Commission de recours en matière de propriété intellectuelle, Einsteinstrasse 2, 3003 Berne. Les mémoires de recours doivent être présentés en trois exemplaires.

13 septembre 2002 Institut Fédéral de la Propriété Intellectuelle:

Division des marques

5618 2002-2011 Schweizerisches Bundesarchiv, Digitale Amtsdruckschriften Archives fédérales suisses, Publications officielles numérisées Archivio federale svizzero, Pubblicazioni ufficiali digitali

Décision dans la procédure d'opposition n° 5081/01

In Bundesblatt Dans Feuille fédérale In Foglio federale

Jahr 2002 Année Anno

Band 1 Volume Volume

Heft 38 Cahier Numero

Geschäftsnummer --- Numéro d'affaire Numero dell'oggetto

Datum 24.09.2002 Date Data

Seite 5618-5618 Page Pagina

Ref. No 10 126 619

Die elektronischen Daten der Schweizerischen Bundeskanzlei wurden durch das Schweizerische Bundesarchiv übernommen.

Les données électroniques de la Chancellerie fédérale suisse ont été reprises par les Archives fédérales suisses.

I dati elettronici della Cancelleria federale svizzera sono stati ripresi dall'Archivio federale svizzero.