Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VPB 2005.2825 AI generated

Federal Supreme Court of Insurance Dismisses Appeals Due to Lack of Justification

Case Number VPB 2005.2825
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Administrative Practice of Federal Authorities (VPB) (CH)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Federal Supreme Court of Insurance dismissed two administrative appeals, joining them into a single proceeding. The court found that the appellants failed to provide sufficient justification for their claims, leading to the rejection of their appeals and the imposition of court costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 11 PCF, art. 135 OJ, art. 40 OJ; Federal Supreme Court of Insurance Dismisses Appeals Due to Lack of Justification: The court found that the appellants failed to provide sufficient justification for their claims, leading to the rejection of their appeals and the imposition of court costs.

Keywords

AI generated
termination of insurance benefits subrogation of insurer administrative dismissal standing to appeal administrative costs reimbursement of insurance costs

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 11 PCF
Cited as the basis for the decision.
art. 135 OJ
Cited as the basis for the decision.
art. 40 OJ
Cited as the basis for the decision.
AI generated
VPB 04-0266-829
Federal Court of Insurance Dismisses Appeal for Lack of Justification
VPB 2004.266
Federal Court of Insurance Dismisses Appeal for Lack of Justification
VPB 6246-2005-2961
Federal Court of Insurance Upholds Prior Ruling Due to Insufficient Evidence
VPB 5518-2002-1953
Federal Supreme Court of Insurance Rejects Unfounded Insurance Appeal
VPB 2002.165
Federal Supreme Court Upholds Lower Court Decision in Insurance Case

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 135 OJ

Cited as the basis for the decision.

art. 40 OJ

Cited as the basis for the decision.

art. 11 PCF

Cited as the basis for the decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Communication (art. 11 PCF en relation avec les art. 40 et 135 OJ)

A Philippe Nizzola-Ceranini et à Dominique Nizzola-Ceranini Statuant sur le recours de droit administratif de Philippe Nizzola-Ceranini, parti sans laisser d’adresse, du 27 octobre 2004, le Tribunal fédéral des assurances, par arrêt du

4 août 2005, a prononcé:

1. Les causes K 150/04 et K 151/04 sont jointes.

2. Les recours sont rejetés.

3. Les frais de justice, d’un montant total de 2800 francs, sont mis à la charge des recourants et sont compensés avec l’avance de frais, d’un même montant, qu’ils ont effectuée. Un exemplaire de l’arrêt ainsi que les annexes sont à votre disposition à la chancellerie du Tribunal fédéral des assurances.

20 septembre 2005 Tribunal fédéral des assurances p.o. du Président:

Le directeur de la Chancellerie, Studer K 150/04 et K 151/04

2005-2825 6205 Schweizerisches Bundesarchiv, Digitale Amtsdruckschriften Archives fédérales suisses, Publications officielles numérisées Archivio federale svizzero, Pubblicazioni ufficiali digitali

Communication

In Bundesblatt Dans Feuille fédérale In Foglio federale

Jahr 2005 Année Anno

Band 1 Volume Volume

Heft 44 Cahier Numero

Geschäftsnummer --- Numéro d'affaire Numero dell'oggetto

Datum 08.11.2005 Date Data

Seite 6205-6205 Page Pagina

Ref. No 10 139 043

Die elektronischen Daten der Schweizerischen Bundeskanzlei wurden durch das Schweizerische Bundesarchiv übernommen.

Les données électroniques de la Chancellerie fédérale suisse ont été reprises par les Archives fédérales suisses.

I dati elettronici della Cancelleria federale svizzera sono stati ripresi dall'Archivio federale svizzero.